Does Complex Hydrology Require Complex Water Quality Policy? Nmanager Simulations for Lake Rotorua

This paper examines six different approaches to nutrient management, and simulates the economic costs and environmental impacts associated with them using NManager, a partial equilibrium simulation model developed by Motu and NIWA, the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research. We focus on Lake Rotorua in the Bay of Plenty in New Zealand, where the regional council is concerned with the decline in the lake's water quality and has set a goal to restore the lake to its condition during the 1960s. Reaching this goal will require significant reductions in the amount of nutrients discharged into the lake, especially from non-point sources such as farm land. Managing water quality is made difficult by the presence of groundwater lags in the catchment: nutrients that leach from the soil arrive at the lake over multiple years. The mitigation schemes we consider are land retirement, requiring best practice, explicit nitrogen limits on landowners, a simple nutrient trading scheme, and two more complex trading schemes that account for groundwater lags. We demonstrate that best practice alone is not sufficient to meet the environmental target for Lake Rotorua. Under an export trading scheme, the distribution of mitigation across the catchment is more cost effective than its distribution under explicit limits on landowners or land retirement. However, the more complex trading schemes do not result in sufficient, or sufficiently certain, gains in cost effectiveness over the simple trading scheme to justify the increase in complexity involved in their implementation.

[1]  Richard Fabling,et al.  Keeping it Together: Tracking Firms on New Zealand’s Longitudinal Business Database , 2011 .

[2]  T. Tietenberg Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice , 2006 .

[3]  D. Smeaton,et al.  Relationships between farm productivity, profitability, N leaching and GHG emissions: a modelling approach , 2011 .

[4]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[5]  S. Kerr,et al.  Preliminary Evidence on Responses to the New Zealand Forestry Emissions Trading Scheme , 2011 .

[6]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Nutrient Trading in Lake Rotorua: Overview of a Prototype System , 2008 .

[7]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1999, Oper. Res..

[8]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A Forest-Profit Expectations Dataset for New Zealand, 1990–2008 , 2012 .

[9]  Paul Krugman,et al.  History versus Expectations , 1991 .

[10]  R. Stavins,et al.  What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Positive and Normative Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading , 1997 .

[11]  Andrew Coleman,et al.  Financial Contracts and the Management of Carbon Emissions in Small Scale Plantation Forests , 2011 .

[12]  J. Sanchirico,et al.  Fishing Quota Markets , 2005 .

[13]  JR Bryanta,et al.  Description and evaluation of the Farmax Dairy Pro decision support model , 2010 .

[14]  J. C. Rutherford,et al.  Management of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Inputs to Lake Rotorua, New Zealand , 1989 .

[15]  S. Kerr,et al.  Nutrient Trading in Lake Rotorua: Determining Net Nutrient Inputs , 2008 .

[16]  R. Horan,et al.  The Economics of Water Quality Trading , 2008 .

[17]  Ming-Feng Hung,et al.  A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits , 2002 .

[18]  Mark A. Sutton,et al.  Too much of a good thing , 2001, Nature.

[19]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Efficient Pollution Regulation: Getting the Prices Right , 2009 .

[20]  John F. Raffensperger,et al.  A Pollution Offset System for Trading Non-Point Source Water Pollution Permits , 2010 .

[21]  M. Selman,et al.  Water Quality Trading Programs : An International Overview , 2009 .

[22]  Suzi Kerr,et al.  Nutrient Trading in Lake Rotorua: Goals and Trading Caps , 2007 .