Key Response Planning Factors for the Aftermath of Nuclear Terrorism

Acknowledgements Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) would like to acknowledge the leadership and expertise of the Department of Homeland Security These individuals made themselves available for assistance and direction on all aspects of the project discussed in this final report. The authors gratefully acknowledge the insights and support of the Modeling and Analysis Coordination Working Group, a technical working group collaborating on key aspects of nuclear effects modeling. Participation in this working group included: nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Executive Summary Despite hundreds of above-ground nuclear tests and data gathered from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the effects of a ground-level, low-yield nuclear detonation in a modern urban environment are still the subject of considerable scientific debate. Extensive review of nuclear weapon effects studies and discussions with nuclear weapon effects experts from various federal agencies, national laboratories, and technical organizations have identified key issues and bounded some of the unknowns required to support response planning for a low-yield, ground-level nuclear detonation in a modern U.S. city. This study, which is focused primarily upon the hazards posed by radioactive fallout, used detailed fallout predictions from the advanced suite of three-dimensional (3-D) meteorology and plume/fallout models developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), including extensive global geographical and real-time meteorological databases to support model calculations. This 3-D modeling system provides detailed simulations that account for complex meteorology and terrain effects. The results of initial modeling and analysis were presented to federal, state, and local working groups to obtain critical, broad-based review and feedback on strategy and messaging. This effort involved a diverse set of communities, The largest potential for reducing casualties A during the post-detonation response phase comes from reducing exposure to fallout radiation. This can be accomplished through early, …

[1]  Wayne M Glines,et al.  PLANNING FOR THE WORST IN WASHINGTON STATE: INITIAL RESPONSE PLANNING FOR IMPROVISED NUCLEAR DEVICE EXPLOSIONS , 2009, Health physics.

[2]  K R Peterson,et al.  Internal dose following a major nuclear war. , 1992, Health physics.

[3]  Fred A. Mettler,et al.  Medical Effects of Ionizing Radiation , 1985 .

[4]  J. D. O'Connor,et al.  Physical and radiochemical properties of fallout particles. , 1966, Health physics.

[5]  Stephen M Cohn,et al.  Trauma deaths in the first hour: are they all unsalvageable injuries? , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[6]  Hulya Ellidokuz,et al.  Risk factors for death and injuries in earthquake: cross-sectional study from Afyon, Turkey. , 2005, Croatian medical journal.

[7]  A Busuttil,et al.  The time of death after trauma , 1995, BMJ.

[8]  Robert B Noland,et al.  Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Paul F. Mlakar,et al.  The Oklahoma City Bombing: Analysis of Blast Damage to the Murrah Building , 1998 .

[10]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[11]  Stephen V. Musolino,et al.  Key Elements of Preparing Emergency Responders for Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism , 2006 .

[12]  B. Bhaduri,et al.  LandScan USA: a high-resolution geospatial and temporal modeling approach for population distribution and dynamics , 2007 .

[13]  W. J. Lacy,et al.  The postattack water-contamination problem. , 1962, Health physics.

[14]  J M Wightman,et al.  Explosions and blast injuries. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  P. Dolan,et al.  The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. Third edition , 1977 .

[16]  Marjorie K Jeffcoat,et al.  Duck and cover: a prudent defense against smallpox. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[17]  Samuel Glasstone,et al.  The Effects of Nuclear Weapons , 1952 .

[18]  T Matsunami,et al.  Electron microprobe analysis of fallout particles. , 1967, Health physics.

[19]  K P Ferlic,et al.  Fallout: Its Characteristics and Management , 1983 .

[20]  S. Einav,et al.  Evacuation Priorities in Mass Casualty Terror-Related Events: Implications for Contingency Planning , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[21]  Howard A. Hawthorne,et al.  Compilation of Local Fallout Data from Test Detonations 1945-1962 Extracted from DASA 1251. Volume II-Oceanic U.S. Tests , 1979 .

[22]  J. Williams,et al.  Impact of on-site care, prehospital time, and level of in-hospital care on survival in severely injured patients. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  R. Dobbelaere EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS. , 1972 .

[24]  Ronald E. Goans,et al.  MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES , 2005, Health physics.

[25]  D. Teague,et al.  Mass casualties in the Oklahoma City bombing. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  J. R. Naidu,et al.  Thyroid absorbed dose for people at Rongelap, Utirik, and Sifo on March 1, 1954 , 1985 .

[27]  I Levanon,et al.  The inhalation hazard of radioactive fallout. , 1988, Health physics.