The acoustic identification of Atlantic mackerel

Korneliussen, R. J. 2010. The acoustic identification of Atlantic mackerel. - ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 1749-1758.Calibrated, digitized data from multifrequency echosounders working simultaneously with nearly identical and overlapping acoustic beams were used to generate new, synthetic echograms which allow Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) to be identified acoustically. The raw echosounder data were processed stepwise in a modular sequence of analyses to improve categorization of the acoustic targets. The relative frequency response measured over as many as six operating frequencies, 18, 38, 70, 120, 200, and 364 kHz, was the main acoustic feature used to characterize the backscatter. Mackerel seemed to have a frequency-independent backscatter below ∼100 kHz, but significantly higher levels of backscattered energy at 200 kHz. Synthetic echograms containing targets identified acoustically as mackerel are presented and evaluated against trawl catches. Although catching fast-swimming mackerel is difficult, trawl catches from three Norwegian research vessels confirmed that the targets identified acoustically as mackerel were indeed that species. Separate experiments performed on mackerel in pens support the findings.

[1]  Ph Wiebe,et al.  A multiple opening/Closing net and environment sensing system for sampling zooplankton , 1976 .

[2]  K. Foote.  Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation : a practical guide , 1987 .

[3]  Arill Engås,et al.  The ‘MultiSampler’: a system for remotely opening and closing multiple codends on a sampling trawl , 1997 .

[4]  Rolf J. Korneliussen,et al.  Measurement and removal of echo integration noise , 2000 .

[5]  Audun Pedersen,et al.  Effects of nonlinear sound propagation in fisheries research , 2007 .

[6]  Egil Ona,et al.  Acoustic backscattering by Atlantic mackerel as being representative of fish that lack a swimbladder. Backscattering by individual fish , 2005 .

[7]  A. Bradley,et al.  New development in the MOCNESS, an apparatus for sampling zooplankton and micronekton , 1985 .

[8]  Rolf J. Korneliussen,et al.  The Bergen echo integrator post-processing system, with focus on recent improvements , 2004 .

[9]  Kenneth G. Foote,et al.  Optimizing copper spheres for precision calibration of hydroacoustic equipment , 1982 .

[10]  E. Ona,et al.  An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data , 2002 .

[11]  K. Foote.  Importance of the swimbladder in acoustic scattering by fish: A comparison of gadoid and mackerel target strengths , 1980 .

[12]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Proposals for the collection of multifrequency acoustic data , 2008 .

[13]  Measurements of acoustic-scattering spectra from the whole and parts of Atlantic mackerel , 2009 .

[14]  E. Ona,et al.  Synthetic echograms generated from the relative frequency response , 2003 .

[15]  Egil Ona,et al.  International Council for the Exploration of the Sea C . M . 1990 / B : 31 s . R Fish Capture Committee HULL MOUNTED , PROTRUDING TRANSDUCER FOR IMPROVING ECHO INTEGRATION IN BAD WEATHER , 2008 .

[16]  E. Ona,et al.  Acoustic backscatter by schools of adult Atlantic mackerel , 2007 .