Trails across the heterogeneous information environment: Manual integration patterns of search systems in molecular medicine

– The purpose of this paper is to aim at modelling the trails, which are search patterns with several search systems across the heterogeneous information environment. In addition, the author seeks to examine what kinds of trails occur in routine, semi-complex and complex tasks, and what barrier types occur during the trail-blazing. , – The author used qualitative task-based approach with shadowing of six molecular medicine researchers during six months, and collected their web interaction logs. Data triangulation made this kind of detailed search system integration analysis possible. , – Five trail patterns emerged: branches, chains, lists, singles and berrypicking trails. The berrypicking was typical to complex work tasks, whereas the branches were common in routine work tasks. Singles and lists were employed typically in semi-complex tasks. In all kinds of trails, the barriers occurred often during the interaction with a single system, but there was a considerable number of barriers with the malfunctioning system integration, and lacking integration features. The findings propose that the trails could be used to reduce the amount of laborious manual system integration, and that there is a need for support to explorative search process in berrypicking trails. , – Research of information behaviour yielding to different types of search patters with several search systems during real-world work task performance in molecular medicine have not been published previously. The author presents a task-based approach how to model search behaviour patterns. The author discusses the issue of system integration, which is a great challenge in biomedical domain, from the viewpoints of information studies and search behaviour.

[1]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Assessing the scenic route: measuring the value of search trails in web logs , 2010, SIGIR.

[4]  Joan C. Bartlett,et al.  A task-based information retrieval interface to support bioinformatics analysis , 2008, IIiX.

[5]  Joan C. Bartlett,et al.  Scientists' preferences for bioinformatics tools: the selection of information retrieval systems , 2012, IIiX.

[6]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[7]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior , 2009, WSDM '09.

[8]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Seonaidh McDonald,et al.  Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research , 2005 .

[10]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: The interactive information retrieval context , 2006, Information Processing & Management.

[11]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[12]  Mark Levene,et al.  An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation (2. ed.) , 2005 .

[13]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Information search tactics , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Use of query reformulation and relevance feedback by Excite users , 2000, Internet Res..

[15]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Building the trail best traveled: effects of domain knowledge on web search trailblazing , 2012, CHI.

[16]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking during Web search sessions , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[18]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching , 2009 .

[19]  Maria-Esther Vidal,et al.  Path-based Systems to Guide Scientists in the Maze of Biological Data Sources , 2006, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[20]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Efthimis N. Efthimiadis,et al.  Analyzing and evaluating query reformulation strategies in web search logs , 2009, CIKM.

[22]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Data collection methods for task-based information access in molecular medicine , 2009 .

[23]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  "I Did It My Way": Social workers as secondary designers of a client information system , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  James Allan,et al.  Meeting of the MINDS: an information retrieval research agenda , 2007, SIGF.

[25]  Robert S. Taylor Question-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries , 1968, Coll. Res. Libr..

[26]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[27]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Barriers to task-based information access in molecular medicine , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Amanda Spink,et al.  How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Information interaction in molecular medicine: integrated use of multiple channels , 2010, IIiX.

[31]  Diane Kelly,et al.  The effects of topic familiarity on information search behavior , 2002, JCDL '02.

[32]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  A classification of tasks in bioinformatics , 2001, Bioinform..

[33]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  The 2012 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and the online Molecular Biology Database Collection , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  Carole Goble,et al.  Distilling structure in scientific workflows , 2012 .

[35]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Implicit measures of lostness and success in web navigation , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[36]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[37]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[38]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  How doctors search: A study of query behaviour and the impact on search results , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[39]  Filip Radlinski,et al.  Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback , 2005, KDD '05.

[40]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[41]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Moves in online searching , 1985 .

[42]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[43]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  The 2012 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and the online Molecular Biology Database Collection , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The user's mental model of an information retrieval system , 1999, SIGIR '85.

[45]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  Search characteristics in different types of Web-based IR environments: Are they the same? , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[46]  Peter Tarczy-Hornoch,et al.  Supporting retrieval of diverse biomedical data using evidence-aware queries , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[47]  Alistair Moffat,et al.  Some Observations on User Search Behaviour , 2006, Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst..

[48]  Dat Tran,et al.  Applying Task Analysis to Describe and Facilitate Bioinformatics Tasks , 2004, MedInfo.

[49]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Modeling and analysis of cross-session search tasks , 2011, SIGIR.

[50]  Turid Hedlund,et al.  The information environment of researchers in molecular medicine , 2008, Inf. Res..