Is bleeding on probing a reliable clinical indicator of peri-implant diseases?

Bleeding on probing (BOP) is regarded as an indispensable diagnostic tool for evaluating periodontal disease activity, however its role in peri-implant disease is more intricate. Much of the confusion about the interpretation originates from drawing parallels between periodontal and peri-implant conditions. BOP can originate from two forms of probing in implants: traumatic or pathologic induction. This, in addition to the dichotomous scale of BOP can complicate diagnosis. The objectives of this editorial include: (1) to discuss the value of BOP as a d6iagnostic tool for peri-implant diseases; (2) the reasons it should be distinct from value for diagnosing periodontal and peri-implant diseases; and (3) the current best evidence on how to implement it in daily clinical practice. A comprehensive bleeding index is proposed for evaluating and monitoring peri-implant conditions. Conclusion: BOP should be used in addition to other parameters such as visual signs of inflammation, probing depth, and progressive bone loss before a peri-implant diagnosis is established. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Biological response to peri-implantitis treatment. , 2019, Journal of periodontal research.

[2]  A. Karch,et al.  Keratinized mucosa width is associated with severity of peri-implant mucositis. A cross-sectional study. , 2019, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  C. Combescure,et al.  The diagnosis of peri‐implantitis: A systematic review on the predictive value of bleeding on probing , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  J. Derks,et al.  Peri‐implantitis , 2018, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  A. Ramanauskaite,et al.  Clinical characteristics of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  M. Nieri,et al.  Peri‐implant bleeding on probing: a cross‐sectional multilevel analysis of associated factors , 2017, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  D. Cochran,et al.  Retrospective Cohort Study of 4,591 Straumann Implants Placed in 2,060 Patients in Private Practice with up to 10-Year Follow-up: The Relationship Between Crestal Bone Level and Soft Tissue Condition. , 2016, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  A. Mombelli,et al.  Pro-inflammatory cytokines at zirconia implants and teeth. A cross-sectional assessment , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[9]  J. Derks,et al.  Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population , 2016, Journal of dental research.

[10]  A. Mombelli,et al.  The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  S. Ivanovski,et al.  Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri-implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  M. Fabbro,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an implant maintenance protocol for the prevention of peri-implant diseases in patients treated with immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations. , 2011, International journal of dental hygiene.

[13]  N. Lang,et al.  Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. , 2010, Periodontology 2000.

[14]  N. Lang,et al.  Bleeding on probing and pocket probing depth in relation to probing pressure and mucosal health around oral implants. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  I. Abrahamsson,et al.  Probe penetration in periodontal and peri-implant tissues. An experimental study in the beagle dog. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  G. Dahlén,et al.  Five-year clinical, microbiological, and radiological outcome following treatment of peri-implantitis in man. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  N. Lang,et al.  Diagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Intraoral transmission and the colonization of oral hard surfaces. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  S. Jepsen,et al.  Progressive peri-implantitis. Incidence and prediction of peri-implant attachment loss. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  N. Lang,et al.  Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  N. Lang,et al.  Histologic probe penetration in healthy and inflamed peri-implant tissues. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  R. Page,et al.  Host Response Tests for Diagnosing Periodontal Diseases. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[24]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Diagnostic discrimination of bleeding on probing during maintenance periodontal therapy. , 1990, American journal of dentistry.

[25]  K. Kalkwarf,et al.  Relationship of gingival bleeding, gingival suppuration, and supragingival plaque to attachment loss. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  G. Greenstein,et al.  Histologic characteristics associated with bleeding after probing and visual signs of inflammation. , 1981, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  H. Löe,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL GINGIVITIS IN MAN. , 1965, The Journal of periodontology.