Long-Term Outcomes of Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Followed in a Tertiary Referral Diabetic Foot Clinic

OBJECTIVE We describe the long-term outcomes of 510 diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and an active foot ulcer or gangrene, seen at the University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, a tertiary care clinic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS These patients were seen between November 2002 and November 2007 (mean follow-up 20 ± 13 months [range 1–66 months]). The Texas Wound Classification was used to grade these wounds that were either class C (ischemia) and D (ischemia+infection) and grade 2–3 (deep–very deep). This comprehensive treatment protocol includes rapid and extensive initial debridement, aggressive use of peripheral percutaneous angioplasty, empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy, and strict follow-up. RESULTS The protocol was totally applied (with percutaneous angioplasty [PA+]) in 456 (89.4%) patients and partially (without percutaneous angioplasty [PA−]) in 54 (10.6%) patients. Outcomes for the whole group and PA+ and PA− patients are, respectively: healing, n = 310 (60.8%), n = 284 (62.3%), and n = 26 (48.1%); major amputation, n = 80 (15.7%), n = 67 (14.7%), and n = 13 (24.1%); death, n = 83 (16.25%), n = 68 (14.9%), and n = 15 (27.8%); and nonhealing, n = 37 (7.25%), n = 37 (8.1%), and n = 0 (0%) (χ2 <0.0009). Predicting variables at multivariate analysis were the following: for healing, ulcer dimension, infection, and ischemic heart disease; and for major amputation, ulcer dimension, number of minor amputations, and age. Additional predicting variables for PA+ patients were the following: for healing, transcutaneous oxygen tension [ΔTcPo2]; and for major amputation, basal TcPo2, basal A1C, ΔTcPo2, and percutaneous angioplasty technical failure. CONCLUSIONS Early diagnosis of CLI, aggressive treatment of infection, and extensive use of percutaneous angioplasty in ischemic affected ulcers offers improved outcome for many previously at-risk limbs. Ulcer size >5 cm2 indicates a reduced chance of healing and increased risk of major amputation. It was thought that all ulcers warrant aggressive treatment including percutaneous angioplasty and that treatment should be considered even for small ischemic ulcers.

[1]  Angela Lipshutz,et al.  Perioperative Glycemic Control: An Evidence-based Review , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[2]  M. Huijberts,et al.  Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study , 2008, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[3]  M. Koelemay,et al.  Subintimal Angioplasty for Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review , 2008, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[4]  P. Faries,et al.  Shifting Paradigms in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Vascular Disease: A Report of 1000 Percutaneous Interventions , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[5]  W. Jeffcoate,et al.  The description and classification of diabetic foot lesions. , 2006, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[6]  J. Forbes,et al.  Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[7]  A. Morabito,et al.  Peripheral angioplasty as the first-choice revascularization procedure in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: prospective study of 993 consecutive patients hospitalized and followed between 1999 and 2003. , 2005, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[8]  A. Caselli,et al.  Transcutaneous oxygen tension msonitoring after successful revascularization in diabetic patients with ischaemic foot ulcers , 2005, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[9]  P. Bell,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Primary Infrainguinal Subintimal Angioplasty in Diabetic Patients with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[10]  P. Blume,et al.  The Multidisciplinary Approach to Limb Salvage , 2004, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[11]  D. Sacks.  The TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) on the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[12]  F. Logerfo,et al.  A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  P. Holstein,et al.  Decreasing incidence of major amputations in people with diabetes , 2000, Diabetologia.

[14]  David G Armstrong,et al.  Validation of a Diabetic Wound Classification System: The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[15]  C. Attinger,et al.  Vascular anatomy of the foot and ankle , 1997 .

[16]  L. Harkless,et al.  Treatment-based classification system for assessment and care of diabetic feet. , 1996, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[17]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Risk Factors for Amputation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  E. Boyko,et al.  Chronology and Determinants of Tissue Repair in Diabetic Lower-Extremity Ulcers , 1991, Diabetes.

[19]  Benjamin A Lipsky,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections , 1988, Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[20]  L. Taylor,et al.  The clinical course of diabetics who require emergent foot surgery because of infection or ischemia. , 1987, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  F. W. Wagner,et al.  The Dysvascular Foot: A System for Diagnosis and Treatment , 1981, Foot & ankle.

[22]  Evan J Ryer,et al.  Reduced primary patency rate in diabetic patients after percutaneous intervention results from more frequent presentation with limb-threatening ischemia. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.