GHG Mitigation Potential, Costs and Benefits in Global Forests: A Dynamic Partial Equilibrium Approach

This paper reports on the global potential for carbon sequestration in forest plantations, and the reduction of carbon emissions from deforestation, in response to six carbon price scenarios from 2000 to 2100. These carbon price scenarios cover a range typically seen in global integrated assessment models. The world forest sector was disaggregated into ten regions, four largely temperate, developed regions: the European Union, Oceania, Russia, and the United States; and six developing, mostly tropical, regions: Africa, Central America, China, India, Rest of Asia, and South America. Three mitigation options -- long- and short-rotation forestry, and the reduction of deforestation -- were analyzed using a global dynamic partial equilibrium model (GCOMAP). Key findings of this work are that cumulative carbon gain ranges from 50.9 to 113.2 Gt C by 2100, higher carbon prices early lead to earlier carbon gain and vice versa, and avoided deforestation accounts for 51 to 78 percent of modeled carbon gains by 2100. The estimated present value of cumulative welfare change in the sector ranges from a decline of $158 billion to a gain of $81 billion by 2100. The decline is associated with a decrease in deforestation.

[1]  David Kaimowitz,et al.  Livestock and deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: a policy perspective , 1995 .

[2]  L. Potter,et al.  Tree planting in Indonesia : trends, impacts and directions , 1998 .

[3]  O. Masera,et al.  Forestry Mitigation Options for Mexico: Finding Synergies between National Sustainable Development Priorities and Global Concerns , 2001 .

[4]  W. Makundi Potential and Cost of Carbon Sequestration in the Tanzanian Forest Sector , 2001 .

[5]  Dale W. Johnson Effects of forest management on soil carbon storage , 1992 .

[6]  K. Andrasko Estimating Global Forestry GHG Mitigation Potential and Costs: A Dynamic Partial Equilibrium Approach , 2003 .

[7]  J. Sathaye,et al.  COPATH-a spreadsheet model for the estimation of carbon flows associated with the use of forest resources , 1995 .

[8]  V. L. Robinson An Econometric Model of Softwood Lumber and Stumpage Markets, 1947-1967 , 1974 .

[9]  P. J. Parks,et al.  Least-Cost Forest Carbon Reserves: Cost-Effective Subsidies to Convert Marginal Agricultural Land to Forests , 1995 .

[10]  Vries B de,et al.  Projections of multi-gas emissions and carbon sinks,and marginal abatement cost functions modelling for land-use related sources , 2003 .

[11]  K. Nair Insect pests and diseases in Indonesian forest: an assessment of the major threats, research efforts and literature , 2000 .

[12]  A. Manne,et al.  The Role of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sinks in Meeting Climate Objectives , 2006 .

[13]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Assessment of promising forest-management practices and technologies for enhancing the conservation and sequestration of atmospheric carbon and their costs at the site level , 1991 .

[14]  Robert J. Moulton,et al.  Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States , 1990 .

[15]  James D. Kerstetter,et al.  Logging and Agricultural Residue Supply Curves for the Pacific Northwest , 2001 .

[16]  CARBON EMISSIONS AND SEQUESTRATION , 2005 .

[17]  Caroline King,et al.  Agriculture and Forestry , 1992 .

[18]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Forestry for sustainable biomass production and carbon sequesteration in India , 2001 .

[19]  J. Sathaye,et al.  Carbon emissions and sequestration in forests: Case studies from seven developing countries , 1992 .

[20]  Brent Sohngen and Roger Sedjo Carbon Sequestration in Global Forests Under Different Carbon Price Regimes , 2006 .

[21]  F. Putz,et al.  Monitoring carbon sequestration benefits associated with a Reduced-Impact Logging Project in Malaysia , 1997 .

[22]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2006 .

[23]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Forestry Sequestration of CO2 and Markets for Timber , 2000 .

[24]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Global warming response options in Brazil's forest sector: Comparison of project-level costs and benefits , 1995 .

[25]  P. Sist,et al.  Management of secondary and logged-over forests in Indonesia: selected proceedings of an international workshop, 17-19 November, 1997 , 1999 .

[26]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Land Use, Climate and Biogeochemical Cycles: Feedbacks and Options for Emission Reduction , 2001 .

[27]  W. Mckillop Supply and demand for forest products—an econometric study , 1967 .

[28]  M. Wise,et al.  An integrated assessment of climate change and the accelerated introduction of advanced energy technologies , 1997 .

[29]  Xiaoquan Zhang,et al.  Mitigation Potential for Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Activities in Southern and Eastern China , 2001 .

[30]  Joanna Isobel House,et al.  Climate change 2001 : synthesis report , 2001 .

[31]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Carbon Sequestration Costs in Global Forests , 2004 .

[32]  B. Sohngen,et al.  An Optimal Control Model of Forest Carbon Sequestration , 2003 .

[33]  D. South Tree Planting in the United States , 2005 .

[34]  Michael D. Hammig,et al.  Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: A Crosscountry Analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia , 2001 .

[35]  P. Fearnside,et al.  Soil carbon changes from conversion of forest to pasture in Brazilian Amazonia , 1998 .

[36]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Future Forest Resources of Western and Eastern Europe , 1992 .

[37]  K. Ghimire,et al.  Agricultural expansion and tropical deforestation: poverty, international trade and land use. , 2000 .

[38]  E. K. S. Nambiar,et al.  Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests : a progress report. Workshop proceedings , 2000 .

[39]  D. Adams A spatial equilibrium model of African-European trade in tropical logs and sawnwood , 1985 .

[40]  Marian Leimbach,et al.  Modeling Agriculture and Land Use in an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2003 .

[41]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  GREENHOUSE GASES FROM DEFORESTATION IN BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA: NET COMMITTED EMISSIONS , 1997 .

[42]  P. Fearnside The Potential of Brazil's Forest Sector for Mitigating Global Warming under the Kyoto Protocol , 2001 .

[43]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  The 1980 softwood timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. , 1980 .

[44]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[45]  R. Boer Economic Assessment of Mitigation Options for Enhancing and Maintaining Carbon Sink Capacity in Indonesia , 2001 .

[46]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Carbon mitigation potential and costs of forestry options in Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines and Tanzania , 2008 .

[47]  E. K. S. Nambiar,et al.  Site management and productivity in tropical plantation forests : workshop proceedings , 1999 .

[48]  J. Sathaye,et al.  A comprehensive mitigation assessment process (COMAP) for the evaluation of forestry mitigation options , 1995 .

[49]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  What contribution can tree plantations make towards meeting Australia’s commitments under the Kyoto Protocol? , 2000 .

[50]  C. Field,et al.  A Primer on the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: What We Don't Know, But Should , 2004 .