Success factors in Title II equity crowdfunding in the United States

Abstract Title II of the JOBS Act has expanded the opportunities for entrepreneurial ventures to raise funds from accredited investors via online equity crowdfunding platforms in the United States. Over $1.4 billion in capital has been committed by the accredited investors in Title II platforms since 2013, yet little is known about how venture characteristics influence the success of raising funds from investors via online equity crowdfunding platforms. Further, it is not known whether online equity crowdfunding is supplementing or replacing traditional venture funding sources. To address these gaps in our knowledge, we draw on research in traditional offline risk capital investments and we evaluate the effects of market, execution and agency risks on equity crowdfunding success by examining 337 ventures that engaged in equity crowdfunding under Title II. We find evidence consistent with investors in online equity crowdfunding platforms giving consideration to all three types of risks. We also find that investors in equity crowdfunding platforms are particularly responsive to the venture ability to attract traditional venture capital funding prior to engaging in equity crowdfunding. These results suggest that online equity crowdfunding platforms are supplementing rather than replacing traditional venture funding sources.

[1]  Stanislav Mamonov,et al.  A 2020 perspective on "Success factors in Title III equity crowdfunding in the United States" , 2020, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[2]  Armin Schwienbacher,et al.  Crowdfunding Cleantech , 2017, Crowdfunding.

[3]  D. Cumming,et al.  Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding , 2012 .

[4]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  The 'Experts' in the Crowd: The Role of Experienced Investors in a Crowdfunding Market , 2018, MIS Q..

[5]  S. Johan,et al.  Is the crowd sensitive to distance?—how investment decisions differ by investor type , 2018 .

[6]  Thomas J. Chemmanur,et al.  Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation Trademarks in Entrepreneurial Finance , 2018 .

[7]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Combining machine-based and econometrics methods for policy analytics insights , 2017 .

[8]  Sung-Byung Yang,et al.  Winning the crowd in online fundraising platforms: The roles of founder and project features , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[9]  Ken Alabi,et al.  Digital blockchain networks appear to be following Metcalfe's Law , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[10]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Herding in a P2P lending market: Rational inference OR irrational trust? , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[11]  Ross A. Malaga,et al.  An exploratory analysis of Title II equity crowdfunding success , 2017 .

[12]  M. Wright,et al.  Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success , 2017 .

[13]  D. Ketchen,et al.  How Should Crowdfunding Research Evolve? A Survey of the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Editorial Board , 2017 .

[14]  B. Bayus,et al.  Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter , 2017 .

[15]  Supradeep Dutta,et al.  Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success , 2016 .

[16]  Aleksandrina Ralcheva,et al.  On the Road to Success in Equity Crowdfunding , 2016 .

[17]  Joseph Feller,et al.  A Rift in the Ground: Theorizing the Evolution of Anchor Values in Crowdfunding Communities through the Oculus Rift Case Study , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Charles Y. Murnieks,et al.  Drawn to the fire: The role of passion, tenacity and inspirational leadership in angel investing , 2016 .

[19]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Christian Catalini,et al.  Can Equity Crowdfunding Democratize Access to Capital and Investment Opportunities? , 2016 .

[21]  Michael Beier,et al.  User Behavior in Crowdfunding Platforms -- Exploratory Evidence from Switzerland , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[22]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  A Typology of Crowdfunding Sponsors: Birds of a Feather Flock Together? , 2015, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[23]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Are Syndicates the Killer App of Equity Crowdfunding? , 2015, California Management Review.

[25]  Difang Wan,et al.  Group social capital and lending outcomes in the financial credit market: An empirical study of online peer-to-peer lending , 2016, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[26]  Supradeep Dutta,et al.  A comparison of the effect of angels and venture capitalists on innovation and value creation , 2016 .

[27]  C. Carpentier,et al.  Angel group members' decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis , 2015 .

[28]  Silvio Vismara,et al.  Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding , 2015 .

[29]  Silvio Vismara,et al.  Information Cascades among Investors in Equity Crowdfunding , 2015 .

[30]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms , 2015, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[31]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Competition, Cooperation and Regulation: Understanding the Evolution of the Mobile Payments Technology Ecosystem , 2015, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[32]  Riza Emekter,et al.  Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending , 2015 .

[33]  M. Colombo,et al.  Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding , 2015 .

[34]  Jonas Hedman,et al.  Do consumers pay more using debit cards than cash? , 2014, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[35]  Victoriya Salomon Emergent models of financial intermediation for innovative companies: from venture capital to crowdinvesting platforms in Switzerland , 2016 .

[36]  G. Markman,et al.  Small Entrants and Large Incumbents: A Framework of Micro Entry , 2014 .

[37]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Crowdfunding , 2013, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[38]  Ethan Mollick The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[39]  R. Harrison Crowdfunding and the revitalisation of the early stage risk capital market: catalyst or chimera? , 2013 .

[40]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: Determinants of Success and Failure , 2013 .

[41]  Sofia Johan,et al.  Demand-driven securities regulation: evidence from crowdfunding , 2013 .

[42]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Individual crowdfunding practices , 2013, Venture Capital.

[43]  R. Harrison,et al.  Business Angel Syndication and the Evolution of Risk Capital in a Small Market Economy: Evidence from Scotland , 2013 .

[44]  Benjamin P. Seigel Title III of the JOBS Act: Using Unsophisticated Wealth to Crowdfund Small Business Capital of Fraudsters' Bank Accounts? , 2013 .

[45]  R. H. Smith,et al.  The Experts in the Crowd: The Role of Reputable Investors in a Crowdfunding Market , 2013 .

[46]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[47]  Peng Liu,et al.  Rational Herding in Microloan Markets , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[48]  X. Tian The Role of Venture Capital Syndication in Value Creation for Entrepreneurial Firms , 2012, Review of Finance.

[49]  Brad Feld,et al.  Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist , 2011 .

[50]  Moren Lévesque,et al.  Business angel early stage decision making , 2011 .

[51]  Na Dai,et al.  Fund Size, Limited Attention, and Valuation of Venture Capital Backed Firms , 2010 .

[52]  C. Mood Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It , 2010 .

[53]  Elena Martínez,et al.  Robust testing in the logistic regression model , 2009, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[54]  S. Read,et al.  Prediction and control under uncertainty: Outcomes in angel investing , 2009 .

[55]  S. Kotha,et al.  Entrepreneur Passion And Preparedness In Business Plan Presentations: A Persuasion Analysis Of Venture Capitalists' Funding Decisions , 2009 .

[56]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  To Be Financed or Not - The Role of Patents for Venture Capital Financing , 2009 .

[57]  J. Angrist Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2008 .

[58]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[59]  Sofia Johan,et al.  Preplanned Exit Strategies in Venture Capital , 2008 .

[60]  R. Harrison,et al.  Measuring business angel investment activity in the United Kingdom: a review of potential data sources , 2008 .

[61]  David H. Hsu,et al.  PATENTS AS QUALITY SIGNALS FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES. , 2008 .

[62]  Colin Clark,et al.  The impact of entrepreneurs' oral ‘pitch’ presentation skills on business angels' initial screening investment decisions , 2008 .

[63]  Raj Echambadi,et al.  Entry Timing and the Survival of Startup and Incumbent Firms in New Industries , 2008 .

[64]  Luca Grilli,et al.  On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital , 2010 .

[65]  Catherine Casamatta,et al.  Experience, screening and syndication in venture capital investments , 2007 .

[66]  David H. Hsu Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding , 2007 .

[67]  S. Morrissette A Profile of Angel Investors , 2007 .

[68]  J. Wyper,et al.  Towards a model of the business angel investment process , 2007 .

[69]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation , 2006 .

[70]  Richard Sudek,et al.  Angel Investment Criteria , 2006 .

[71]  Yael V. Hochberg,et al.  Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance , 2004 .

[72]  E. Lazear Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[73]  Rosalind W. Picard Affective computing: challenges , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[74]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[75]  W. Payne,et al.  The anatomy of an angel investing network: Tech Coast Angels , 2002 .

[76]  Richard T. Harrison,et al.  Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments , 2002 .

[77]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[78]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Foundations for Growth: How to Identify and Build Disruptive New Businesses , 2002 .

[79]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  Mark van Osnabrugge A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: An agency theory-based analysis , 2000 .

[81]  Per Strömberg,et al.  Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts , 2000 .

[82]  Sabine Kuester,et al.  Retaliatory Behavior to New Product Entry , 1999 .

[83]  George H. Haines,et al.  Private investors' investment criteria: Insights from qualitative data , 1999 .

[84]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[85]  T. Noe,et al.  Asymmetric Information, Managerial Opportunism, Financing, and Payout Policies , 1996 .

[86]  Ana M. Bianco,et al.  Robust Estimation in the Logistic Regression Model , 1996 .

[87]  P. J. Huber,et al.  Robust statistics, data analysis, and computer intensive methods : in honor of Peter Huber's 60th birthday , 1996 .

[88]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .