Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers

The dependence of fMRI activation on sound level was examined throughout the auditory pathway of normal human listeners using continuous broadband noise, a stimulus widely used in neuroscientific investigations of auditory processing, but largely neglected in neuro-imaging. Several specialized techniques were combined here for the first time to enhance detection of brainstem activation, mitigate scanner noise, and recover temporal resolution lost by the mitigation technique. The main finding was increased activation with increasing level in cochlear nucleus, superior olive, inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body and auditory cortical areas. We suggest that these increases reflect monotonically increasing activity in a preponderance of individual auditory neurons responsive to broadband noise. While the time-course of activation changed with level, the change was subtle and only significant in a part of the cortex. To our knowledge, these are the first fMRI data showing the effects of sound level in subcortical centers or for a non-tonal, non-speech stimulus at any stage of the pathway. The present results add to the body of parametric data in normal human listeners and are fundamental to the design of any fMRI experiment employing continuous noise.

[1]  Monica L. Hawley,et al.  Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei , 2005, Hearing Research.

[2]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  Stanley R. Johnson,et al.  Advanced Econometric Methods , 1984 .

[4]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Imaging subcortical auditory activity in humans , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[5]  L. Aitkin.  Rate-level functions of neurons in the inferior colliculus of cats measured with the use of free-field sound stimuli. , 1991, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Topographical variation of the human primary cortices: implications for neuroimaging, brain mapping, and neurobiology. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  M. Harms,et al.  Sound repetition rate in the human auditory pathway: representations in the waveshape and amplitude of fMRI activation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  André Brechmann,et al.  Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Harms,et al.  Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically‐motivated basis set , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Alan R. Palmer,et al.  Binaural specialisation in human auditory cortex: an fMRI investigation of interaural correlation sensitivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  Lisa A. de la Mothe,et al.  A comparison of neuron response properties in areas A1 and CM of the marmoset monkey auditory cortex: tones and broadband noise. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Event-Related fMRI of the Auditory Cortex , 1998, NeuroImage.

[15]  Peter Heil,et al.  Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex , 1994, Hearing Research.

[16]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Level-dependent representation of stimulus frequency in cat primary auditory cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  A R Palmer,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Amplitopicity of the Human Auditory Cortex: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  S. Posse,et al.  Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Christoph Mulert,et al.  Sound level dependence of the primary auditory cortex: Simultaneous measurement with 61-channel EEG and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Neurons in the cat's primary auditory cortex distinguished by their responses to tones and wide-spectrum noise , 1985, Hearing Research.

[22]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  V. Haughton,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the central auditory pathway following speech and pure‐tone stimuli , 1995, The Laryngoscope.

[24]  R. Briggs,et al.  Influence of speech stimuli intensity on the activation of auditory cortex investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl’s gyrus is different for low- and high-frequency tones , 2003, Hearing Research.

[26]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Some neural mechanisms in the cat's auditory cortex underlying sensitivity to combined tone and wide-spectrum noise stimuli , 1985, Hearing Research.

[28]  R. Nudo,et al.  Stimulation‐induced [14C]2‐deoxyglucose labeling of synaptic activity in the central auditory system , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  D. Hall,et al.  Heschl’s gyrus is more sensitive to tone level than non-primary auditory cortex , 2002, Hearing Research.

[30]  T. Imig,et al.  Functional organization of sound direction and sound pressure level in primary auditory cortex of the cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[33]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: distribution of integrated excitation. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  O. Arthurs,et al.  How well do we understand the neural origins of the fMRI BOLD signal? , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  Irina S. Sigalovsky,et al.  Short-term sound temporal envelope characteristics determine multisecond time patterns of activity in human auditory cortex as shown by fMRI. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Attention‐related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex , 1997, Neuroreport.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[38]  R. Burkard,et al.  The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system: responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz tones at varied intensities. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[40]  T. Imig,et al.  Single-unit selectivity to azimuthal direction and sound pressure level of noise bursts in cat high-frequency primary auditory cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Intensity-dependent Activation of the Primary Auditory Cortex in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.