Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Plaut,et al. More modeling but still no stages: Reply to Borowsky and Besner , 2006 .
[2] K. Forster,et al. Unconscious cognition isn’t that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word naming task , 2008, Cognition.
[3] J. H. Neely,et al. Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: automatic semantic access may not be a myth. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[4] M. Masson,et al. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[5] S. Sternberg,et al. The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .
[6] D. Besner,et al. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[7] J. Raaijmakers. A further look at the "language-as-fixed-effect fallacy". , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[8] James L. McClelland,et al. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.
[9] Robin D. Thomas. Processing time predictions of current models of perception in the classic additive factors paradigm , 2006 .
[10] Kenneth I Forster,et al. Dynamic adaptation to history of trial difficulty explains the effect of congruency proportion on masked priming. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[11] Thomas H. Killion,et al. Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .
[12] D. Besner,et al. Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of an expectancy , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.
[13] D. Besner,et al. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] Kevin N. Gurney,et al. Additive Factors Do Not Imply Discrete Processing Stages: A Worked Example Using Models of the Stroop Task , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[15] Robert F. Stanners,et al. Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .
[16] Thomas A. Schreiber,et al. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[17] Ron Borowsky,et al. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? , 2006, Psychological review.
[18] C. A. Becker. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] Brandon M. Turner,et al. A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection. , 2011, Psychological review.
[20] D. Besner,et al. Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[21] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[22] David A. Balota,et al. Visual Word Recognition , 2015, Linguistics.
[23] James H. Neely,et al. When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .
[24] Kevin N. Gurney,et al. Piéron's Law Holds During Stroop Conflict: Insights Into the Architecture of Decision Making , 2011, Cogn. Sci..
[25] D Laming,et al. Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. , 1979, Acta psychologica.
[26] Franck Vidal,et al. Sequential adjustments before and after partial errors , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[27] D. Massaro,et al. Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[28] K. Stanovich,et al. On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[29] M. Botvinick,et al. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.
[30] Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al. Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .
[31] David A. Balota,et al. Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity , 2009 .
[32] J. Raaijmakers,et al. How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .
[33] Derek Besner,et al. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] Marco Zorzi,et al. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] L. Mertz. The Right Tool for the Job , 2011, IEEE Pulse.
[36] Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009). , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[38] James L. McClelland. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .
[39] D. Plaut,et al. Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.
[40] John J. L. Morton,et al. Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .
[41] Timothy C Rickard,et al. Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: an item-level test of candidate models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[42] Saul Sternberg,et al. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .
[43] Derek Besner,et al. Reading aloud: evidence for contextual control over lexical activation. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] Derek Besner,et al. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[45] B. Newell,et al. The Right Tool for the Job? Comparing an Evidence Accumulation and a Naive Strategy Selection Model of Decision Making , 2011 .
[46] G. Logan. Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .
[47] P. Rabbitt. Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.
[48] Ron Borowsky,et al. Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation. , 1991 .
[49] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention , 2010, Front. Psychology.
[50] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Testing theories of post-error slowing , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[51] Derek Besner,et al. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[52] Curt Burgess,et al. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .
[53] M. Masson,et al. A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .
[54] Derek Besner,et al. Visual word recognition: evidence for global and local control over semantic feedback. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[55] T. Carr,et al. Implications of measures of reliability for theories of priming: Activity in semantic memory is inherently noisy and uncoordinated , 2005 .
[56] Rebecca Treiman,et al. The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[57] M. Masson. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[58] R. Ulrich,et al. Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[59] B. Mittelman,et al. On control. , 1979, Dental management.
[60] Michael D. Lee,et al. Decision Making and Confidence Given Uncertain Advice , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[61] Marco Zorzi,et al. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.
[62] H. Bergh,et al. Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .
[63] David A Balota,et al. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[64] D. Laming. Choice reaction performance following an error , 1979 .