Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Peripheral Afferents and Cortical Area 3b and 1 Neurons in the Primate Somatosensory System

Neurons in area 3b have been previously characterized using linear spatial receptive fields with spatially separated excitatory and inhibitory regions. Here, we expand on this work by examining the relationship between excitation and inhibition along both spatial and temporal dimensions and comparing these properties across anatomical areas. To that end, we characterized the spatiotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) of 32 slowly adapting type 1 (SA1) and 21 rapidly adapting peripheral afferents and of 138 neurons in cortical areas 3b and 1 using identical random probe stimuli. STRFs of peripheral afferents consist of a rapidly appearing excitatory region followed by an in-field (replacing) inhibitory region. STRFs of SA1 afferents also exhibit flanking (surround) inhibition that can be attributed to skin mechanics. Cortical STRFs had longer time courses and greater inhibition compared with peripheral afferent STRFs, with less replacing inhibition in area 1 neurons compared with area 3b neurons. The greater inhibition observed in cortical STRFs point to the existence of underlying intracortical mechanisms. In addition, the shapes of excitatory and inhibitory lobes of both peripheral and cortical STRFs remained mostly stable over time, suggesting that their feature selectivity remains constant throughout the time course of the neural response. Finally, the gradual increase in the proportion of surround inhibition from the periphery to area 3b to area 1, and the concomitant decrease in response linearity of these neurons indicate the emergence of increasingly feature-specific response properties along the somatosensory pathway.

[1]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Tactile activity in primate primary somatosensory cortex during active arm movements: cytoarchitectonic distribution. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Spectro-temporal characterization of auditory neurons , 1981 .

[3]  James J DiCarlo,et al.  Receptive field structure in cortical area 3b of the alert monkey , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  J Hyvärinen,et al.  Movement‐sensitive and direction and orientation‐selective cutaneous receptive fields in the hand area of the post‐central gyrus in monkeys. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[6]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Randall J. Nelson,et al.  High-frequency vibratory sensitive neurons in monkey primary somatosensory cortex: entrained and nonentrained responses to vibration during the performance of vibratory-cued hand movements , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  T. Powell,et al.  Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. II. Contralateral cortical connexions. , 1969, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[13]  John W. Lane,et al.  Marking microelectrode penetrations with fluorescent dyes , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  L. Pubols,et al.  Orientation detectors in the primary somatosensory neocortex of the raccoon , 1977, Brain Research.

[15]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Neural Coding Mechanisms Underlying Perceived Roughness of Finely Textured Surfaces , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  E P Gardner,et al.  Objective classification of motion- and direction-sensitive neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  S S Hsiao,et al.  Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Form processing and attention effects in the somatosensory system , 1996 .

[19]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Surround suppression in the responses of primate SA1 and RA mechanoreceptive afferents mapped with a probe array. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Neural mechanisms of absolute tactile localization in monkeys. , 1988, Somatosensory & motor research.

[21]  John W. Lane,et al.  Representation of orientation in the somatosensory system , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  L. Palmer,et al.  Comparison of responses to moving and stationary stimuli in cat striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  I N Bankman,et al.  Neural image transformation in the somatosensory system of the monkey: comparison of neurophysiological observations with responses in a neural network model. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[24]  Masahiro Sakamoto,et al.  Rostrocaudal gradients in the neuronal receptive field complexity in the finger region of the alert monkey's postcentral gyrus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  A. Leventhal.  The neural basis of visual function , 1991 .

[26]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  T. Powell,et al.  Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. 3. Thalamic connexions. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Spatiotemporal receptive field organization in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cats and kittens. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Adaptation of the Reitboeck method of multiple microelectrode recording to the neocortex of the waking monkey , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  J. Kaas,et al.  Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic area 3b and 1 in “SI” in the owl monkey (aotus trivirgatus) , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Primate Somatosensory Area 3b: Effects of Stimulus Scanning Direction and Orientation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  E P Gardner,et al.  Somatosensory cortical mechanisms of feature detection in tactile and kinesthetic discrimination. , 1988, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[36]  J. Kaas,et al.  Magnification, receptive-field area, and "hypercolumn" size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Inhibitory contributions to spatiotemporal receptive-field structure and direction selectivity in simple cells of cat area 17. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[39]  A. Aertsen,et al.  The Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  D. Ringach.  Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Patterns of excitation and inhibition evoked by horizontal connections in visual cortex share a common relationship to orientation columns , 1995, Neuron.

[43]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[46]  M. Sur.  Receptive fields of neurons in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in monkeys , 1980, Brain Research.

[47]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  M Sur,et al.  Modular distribution of neurons with slowly adapting and rapidly adapting responses in area 3b of somatosensory cortex in monkeys. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.