Impact of adaptive thermal comfort criteria on building energy use and cooling equipment size using

Abstract Recently adaptive thermal-comfort criteria have been introduced in the international indoor-climate standards to reduce the heating/cooling energy requirements. In 2008, the Finnish Society of Indoor Air Quality (FiSIAQ) developed the national adaptive thermal-comfort criteria of Finland. The current study evaluates the impact of the Finnish Criteria on energy performance in an office building. Two fully mechanically air-conditioned single offices are taken as representative zones. A simulation-based optimization scheme (a combination of IDA-ICE 4.0 and a multi-objective genetic-algorithm from MATLAB-2008a) is employed to determine the minimum primary energy use and the minimum room cooling-equipment size required for different thermal comfort levels. The applicability of implementing energy-saving measures such as night ventilation, night set-back temperature, day lighting as well as optimal building envelope and optimal HVAC settings are addressed by investigating 24 design variables. The results show that, on average, an additional 10 kWh/(m 2  a) primary energy demand and a larger 10 W/m 2 room cooling-equipment size are required to improve the thermal comfort from medium ( S 2) to high-quality ( S 1) class; higher thermal comfort levels limit the use of night ventilation and water radiator night-set back options. Compared with the ISO EN 7730-2005 standard, the Finnish criterion could slightly decrease the heating/cooling equipment size. However, it significantly increases both the heating and cooling energy demand; the results show 32.8% increase in the primary energy demand. It is concluded that the Finnish criterion-2008 is strict and does not allow for energy-efficient solutions in standard office buildings.

[1]  Sebastian Herkel,et al.  Comparison of low-energy office buildings in summer using different thermal comfort criteria , 2007 .

[2]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe , 2002 .

[3]  R. de Dear,et al.  Adaptive temperature limits: A new guideline in The Netherlands: A new approach for the assessment of building performance with respect to thermal indoor climate☆ , 2006 .

[4]  Gail Brager,et al.  Climate, Comfort & Natural Ventilation: A new adaptive comfort standard for ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2001 .

[5]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[6]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  The impact of indoor thermal conditions, system controls and building types on the building energy demand , 2008 .

[7]  Leslie K. Norford,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Optimization of Building Envelopes and the Design and Control of HVAC Systems , 2003 .

[8]  David P.Wyon.  Individual control at each workplace: the means and the potential benefits , 2007 .

[9]  Jonathan A. Wright,et al.  Optimization of building thermal design and control by multi-criterion genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[10]  Weimin Wang,et al.  Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization , 2005 .

[11]  P. Fanger.  Moderate Thermal Environments Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort , 1984 .

[12]  Derek Clements-Croome.  Creating the Productive Workplace , 1999 .

[13]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[14]  Stuart Barlow,et al.  Occupant comfort in UK offices—How adaptive comfort theories might influence future low energy office refurbishment strategies , 2007 .

[15]  F. Nicol,et al.  Maximum temperatures in European office buildings to avoid heat discomfort , 2007 .

[16]  R. Dear,et al.  Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review , 1998 .

[17]  Gail Brager,et al.  A Standard for Natural Ventilation , 2000 .

[18]  Jarek Kurnitski,et al.  Trends and drivers in the Finnish ventilation and AC market , 2008 .

[19]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[20]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[21]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Applying a multi-objective optimization approach for Design of low-emission cost-effective dwellings , 2011 .

[22]  Ala Hasan,et al.  A genetic algorithm for optimization of building envelope and HVAC system parameters , 2009 .