11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis

A traditional approach to system design is to optimize the system with regard to a set of system objectives, as defined in a given context. This approach falls short when designing systems that are capable of delivering sustained value to stakeholders in the face of a rapidly changing world. In order to achieve this value robustness, systems should be designed using natural value-centric time scales, as defined by their contexts, for conceptualizing system timelines. EpochEraAnalysis is an approach that provides for visualization and a structured way to think about the temporal system value environment. This paper discusses Epoch-Era Analysis as central to a tradespace exploration process for system design comparison and selection, invoking passive or active value robustness design strategies. The analysis can also serve as a socio-technical bridge, integrating the tradespace exploration activities of architects and engineers, which may be traditionally independent efforts in contemporary engineering programs.

[1]  Rick Kazman,et al.  Toward a discipline of scenario‐based architectural engineering , 2000, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[2]  David Laibson,et al.  Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach , 2001 .

[3]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005, Syst. Eng..

[4]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  A Framework for Incorporating "ilities" in Tradespace Studies , 2007 .

[5]  Donna H. Rhodes,et al.  The Case for Evolving Systems Engineering as a Field within Engineering Systems , 2004 .

[6]  Oscar A. Saenz,et al.  Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework , 2003 .

[7]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2006 .

[8]  Roland Sauerbrey,et al.  Biography , 1992, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[9]  Doyle,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems , 2000, Physical review letters.

[10]  Tim Robertson,et al.  INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  9.4.3 Defining System Changeability: Reconciling Flexibility, Adaptability, Scalability, and Robustness for Maintaining System Lifecycle Value , 2007 .

[12]  J. Bentham An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[13]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  5.2.2 Addressing the System of Systems Challenge , 2005 .

[14]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[15]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Managing unarticulated value : changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2006 .