Engaging the human in the design of residential energy reduction applications

Most online energy conservation interfaces assume that information provision is sufficient to induce behavior change and energy use reductions. A gap between behavioral theory and field practice partly explains why interfaces have not achieved this goal. In this paper, we describe a research program on human centered interactive interface design that bridges this gap with consumer based investigation of two energy reduction interfaces: Kidogo and Powerbar. Kidogo allows users to donate savings from energy conservation to public goods. In the first study, which examines Kidogo components, we investigate how alternative beneficiaries help users to connect emotionally with saving energy. In our second study, comparing Kidogo and Powerbar interventions, we investigate the ability of affectively and cognitively framed interfaces to persuade individuals to perform conservation behaviors. The first study suggests that interfaces should use negative valence images to establish an emotional connection, and the second provides evidence that affectively framed interfaces promote willingness to perform conservation behaviors.

[1]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding , 2004 .

[2]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings , 1993, INTERCHI.

[3]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[4]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive Technologies - Introduction. , 1999 .

[5]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Mark Stefik,et al.  Cognoter: theory and practice of a colab-orative tool , 1986, CSCW '86.

[8]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[9]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control , 1999, TCHI.

[10]  S. Bly,et al.  Commune: a shared drawing surface , 1990, COCS '90.

[11]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[12]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Why people gesture when they speak , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: effects on outcomes and communication , 1996, CSCW '96.

[14]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[15]  Steve Freeman,et al.  MMM: a user interface architecture for shared editors on a single screen , 1991, UIST '91.

[16]  Richard Osbaldiston,et al.  Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science , 2012 .

[17]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[18]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[19]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[20]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Dynamo: a public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media , 2003, UIST '03.

[21]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Design for Conversation: Lessons from Cognoter , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  Technology's four roles in understanding individuals' conservation of natural resources , 2007 .

[23]  E. Maibach,et al.  Self-efficacy in health promotion research and practice: conceptualization and measurement , 1995 .

[24]  K. Witte Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[25]  William Allen,et al.  The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness , 1953 .

[26]  J. Bavelas,et al.  "I show how you feel": Motor mimicry as a communicative act. , 1986 .

[27]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[28]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays , 2005, CHI.

[30]  N. Kaza Understanding the spectrum of residential energy consumption: A quantile regression approach , 2010 .

[31]  David S. Kirk,et al.  Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks , 2006, CHI.

[32]  Scott L. Minneman,et al.  The DrawStream Station or the AVCs of Video Cocktail Napkins , 1999, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems.

[33]  Markus Appel,et al.  Transportation and Need for Affect in Narrative Persuasion: A Mediated Moderation Model , 2010 .

[34]  G. Maio,et al.  The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[35]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact , 1992, CHI.

[36]  A. Leiserowitz Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. , 2007 .

[37]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[38]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment , 1993, CACM.

[39]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Behavior : An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing , 2000 .

[40]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[41]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Information and Its Outcomes Interplay of Negative Emotion and Health Self-Efficacy on the Use of Health , 2008 .