A generalised background correction algorithm for a Halo Doppler lidar and its application to data from Finland

Abstract. Current commercially available Doppler lidars provide an economical and robust solution for measuring vertical and horizontal wind velocities, together with the ability to provide co- and cross-polarised backscatter profiles. The high temporal resolution of these instruments allows turbulent properties to be obtained from studying the variation in radial velocities. However, the instrument specifications mean that certain characteristics, especially the background noise behaviour, become a limiting factor for the instrument sensitivity in regions where the aerosol load is low. Turbulent calculations require an accurate estimate of the contribution from velocity uncertainty estimates, which are directly related to the signal-to-noise ratio. Any bias in the signal-to-noise ratio will propagate through as a bias in turbulent properties. In this paper we present a method to correct for artefacts in the background noise behaviour of commercially available Doppler lidars and reduce the signal-to-noise ratio threshold used to discriminate between noise, and cloud or aerosol signals. We show that, for Doppler lidars operating continuously at a number of locations in Finland, the data availability can be increased by as much as 50 % after performing this background correction and subsequent reduction in the threshold. The reduction in bias also greatly improves subsequent calculations of turbulent properties in weak signal regimes.

[1]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Can the direct and semi‐direct aerosol effect compete with the indirect effect on a global scale? , 2001 .

[2]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Sensitivity studies of different aerosol indirect effects in mixed-phase clouds , 2009 .

[3]  R. Hogan,et al.  A method to diagnose boundary‐layer type using Doppler lidar , 2013 .

[4]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Sensitivity studies of di ff erent aerosol indirect e ff ects in mixed-phase clouds , 2009 .

[5]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Aerosol‐cloud semi‐direct effect and land‐sea temperature contrast in a GCM , 2010 .

[6]  Ronny Leinweber,et al.  An assessment of the performance of a 1.5 μm Doppler lidar for operational vertical wind profiling based on a 1-year trial , 2015 .

[7]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Surface-based remote sensing of the mixing-layer height a review , 2008 .

[8]  R. Welsch,et al.  The Hat Matrix in Regression and ANOVA , 1978 .

[9]  Chris G. Collier,et al.  Remote sensing of the tropical rain forest boundary layer using pulsed Doppler lidar , 2010 .

[10]  Guy N. Pearson,et al.  An Analysis of the Performance of the UFAM Pulsed Doppler Lidar for Observing the Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[11]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Residuals and Influence in Regression , 1982 .

[12]  E. O'connor,et al.  A Method for Estimating the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from a Vertically Pointing Doppler Lidar, and Independent Evaluation from Balloon-Borne In Situ Measurements , 2010 .

[13]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Low-level mixing height detection in coastal locations with a scanning Doppler lidar , 2014 .

[14]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Observing wind, aerosol particles, cloud and precipitation: Finland's new ground-based remote-sensing network , 2013 .

[15]  E. Asmi,et al.  Aerosol decadal trends - Part 2: In-situ aerosol particle number concentrations at GAW and ACTRIS stations , 2012 .

[16]  B. Silverman,et al.  The Stationary Wavelet Transform and some Statistical Applications , 1995 .

[17]  Sébastien Denvil,et al.  Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation , 2013 .

[18]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression , 2000, Technometrics.

[19]  Harald Flentje,et al.  Aerosol decadal trends - Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations , 2012 .

[20]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Regression Diagnostics , 1985 .

[21]  B. J. Rye,et al.  Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar. I. Spectral accumulation and the Cramer-Rao lower bound , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..