Linkages of project environment to performance: lessons for team leadership

Abstract This field study of 76 technology-based project teams examines the influences of the project environment on team performance. The results show that in spite of cultural differences among organizations a general agreement exist on the factors that drive team performance. One of the most striking finding is the large number of performance factors that is derived from the human side. Organizational components that satisfy personal and professional needs seem to have a strong effect on cooperation, commitment, risk management, and ultimately drive overall team performance. Other influences are derived from the organizational process, which often have their locus outside the project organization. The findings help to better understand the linkages between team environment and performance, and more effectively manage project teams, especially in complex work environments.

[1]  William R. King,et al.  Project Management Handbook , 1983 .

[2]  Mark Keil,et al.  Predicting information technology project escalation: A neural network approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Walid Belassi,et al.  A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects , 1996 .

[4]  Biren Prasad.  Decentralized cooperation: a distributed approach to team design in a concurrent engineering organization , 1998 .

[5]  David L. Stum.  Maslow revisited: building the employee commitment pyramid , 2003 .

[6]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A NEW TIME , 2002 .

[7]  Biren Prasad.  Towards life–cycle measures and metrics for concurrent product development , 2002 .

[8]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Building collaborative cross-functional new product teams , 1999 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Building high performing engineering project teams , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  R. Zanoni,et al.  Project management model for a physically distributed software development environment , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[12]  Patrick Brown,et al.  Managing software development , 1985 .

[13]  David I. Cleland,et al.  Global Project Management Handbook , 1993 .

[14]  Duksup Shim,et al.  Upward influence styles of R&D project leaders , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[15]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer in IT Projects , 2004 .

[16]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Managing technology-based projects in multinational environments , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[17]  Rajesh Nellore,et al.  Factors influencing success in integrated product development (IPD) projects , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Managing Innovative R&D Teams , 2003 .

[19]  Adrian J. Slywotzky,et al.  Becoming a digital business: ‐ it’s not about technology , 2001 .

[20]  Dick McCann,et al.  Team Management , 1995 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[22]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[23]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Management of Organizational Behavior. , 1970 .

[24]  A. Sivathanu Pillai,et al.  Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment , 2002 .

[25]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Enhancing Innovative Performance of Self-Directed Engineering Teams , 1996 .

[26]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution , 2001 .

[27]  W. Dyer,et al.  Team Building: Issues and Alternatives , 1977 .