IT Governance Impact Model: How mature IT Governance affects Business Performance

This paper presents a theory based model that proposes and explains the positive impact of IT governance on the business performance of the firm. The study takes the resource based perspective and integrates the economic theory of complementarities, the concept of resource relatedness as well as the knowledge based view. The proposed increase of business performance is grounded in the generation of sustainable competitive advantage through super-additive value synergies, which are considered as being hard to copy by competitors. The theoretical model is developed and substantiated in two stages. During the first stage, eleven exploratory case studies of major multinational corporations were used for theory building. During the second stage, eight case studies with comparable companies were conducted for theory refinement and substantiation. The results suggest that IT governance is positively related to business performance through the mediators IT relatedness and business process relatedness. It is argued that the latter two are complementary in the sense that they do not only increase business performance independently, but add extra value if available concurrently. The results furthermore imply that the absorptive capacity of the IT department has a significant moderating effect.

[1]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[2]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[3]  Enrique Silva,et al.  Business and IT Governance Alignment Simulation Essay on a Business Process  and IT Service Model , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[4]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[5]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[10]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[12]  Norman L. Chervany,et al.  The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function , 1980, MIS Q..

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The information economy: A new perspective for effective information systems management , 1986, DATB.

[14]  Michael Goold,et al.  Why diversify? Four decades of management thinking , 1993 .

[15]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[17]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances , 2001 .

[18]  M. Bishop What is this thing called Science , 1996 .

[19]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[20]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  Information Architecture: In Search of Efficient Flexibility , 1991, MIS Q..

[21]  John F. Rockart,et al.  The rise of managerial computing: the best of the Center for Information Systems Research , 1986 .

[22]  Armin Heinzl,et al.  The Impact of IT Governance on Business Performance , 2011, AMCIS.

[23]  Carol V. Brown Horizontal Mechanisms Under Differing IS Organization Contexts , 1999, MIS Q..

[24]  A. F. Chalmers,et al.  What Is This Thing Called Science , 1976 .

[25]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Information Specificity and Environmental Scanning: An Economic Perspective , 1997, MIS Q..

[26]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Paul J. Dixon,et al.  Technology Issues Facing Corporate Management in the 1990s , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  Peter G.W. Keen,et al.  Communications in the 21st century: Telecommunications and business policy , 1981 .

[29]  Rachel Davis,et al.  Direct estimation of synergy: a new approach to the diversity-performance debate , 1993 .

[30]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Governance of the IT Function: Valuing Agility and Quality of Training, Cooperation and Communications , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[31]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Strategic Alignment Maturity: A Structural Equation Model Validation , 2008, AMCIS.

[32]  J. Spender Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[33]  Carol V. Brown Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence From a Single Case Site , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[35]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[37]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[38]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  The Impact of IT Governance on Organizational Performance , 2011, AMCIS.

[39]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[40]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[41]  Gail Ridley,et al.  Attempting to Define IT Governance: Wisdom or Folly? , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[42]  M. Jelinek Technology, Organizations, and Contingency , 1977 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Information Technology Planning in the 1990's: Directions for Practice and Research , 1987, MIS Q..

[46]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[47]  W. V. Grembergen,et al.  Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms for IT Governance , 2004 .

[48]  William R. King,et al.  Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems , 1978, MIS Q..

[49]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[50]  F. Hayek The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[51]  David S. Preston,et al.  Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications , 2010, MIS Q..

[52]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[53]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[54]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[55]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[56]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[57]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[58]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Implementing Core IS Capabilities:: Feeny–Willcocks IT Governance and Management Framework Revisited , 2006 .

[59]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[60]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[61]  Hamid Reza Tavakolian,et al.  A study of the relationship between the degree of user control over information systems functions and the overall strategies of organizations , 1987 .

[62]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[63]  Gerry C. Jacobs,et al.  Whose responsibility is IT management , 1995 .

[64]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[65]  R. Peterson Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance , 2004 .

[66]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[67]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[68]  John F. Rockart,et al.  The management of distributed processing , 1979 .

[69]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[70]  Peter Weill,et al.  Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.