The auditory P300-based single-switch brain-computer interface: Paradigm transition from healthy subjects to minimally conscious patients

OBJECTIVE Within this work an auditory P300 brain-computer interface based on tone stream segregation, which allows for binary decisions, was developed and evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two tone streams consisting of short beep tones with infrequently appearing deviant tones at random positions were used as stimuli. This paradigm was evaluated in 10 healthy subjects and applied to 12 patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) at clinics in Graz, Würzburg, Rome, and Liège. A stepwise linear discriminant analysis classifier with 10×10 cross-validation was used to detect the presence of any P300 and to investigate attentional modulation of the P300 amplitude. RESULTS The results for healthy subjects were promising and most classification results were better than random. In 8 of the 10 subjects, focused attention on at least one of the tone streams could be detected on a single-trial basis. By averaging 10 data segments, classification accuracies up to 90.6% could be reached. However, for MCS patients only a small number of classification results were above chance level and none of the results were sufficient for communication purposes. Nevertheless, signs of consciousness were detected in 9 of the 12 patients, not on a single-trial basis, but after averaging of all corresponding data segments and computing significant differences. These significant results, however, strongly varied across sessions and conditions. CONCLUSION This work shows the transition of a paradigm from healthy subjects to MCS patients. Promising results with healthy subjects are, however, no guarantee of good results with patients. Therefore, more investigations are required before any definite conclusions about the usability of this paradigm for MCS patients can be drawn. Nevertheless, this paradigm might offer an opportunity to support bedside clinical assessment of MCS patients and eventually, to provide them with a means of communication.

[1]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  S Laureys,et al.  Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness , 2008, Neurology.

[3]  C. Degueldre,et al.  Auditory processing in the vegetative state. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Better than random? A closer look on BCI results , 2008 .

[5]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[6]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  A Single-Switch BCI Based on Passive and imagined movements: toward Restoring Communication in Minimally Conscious patients , 2013, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[7]  Shin'ichiro Kanoh,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System Based on Auditory Stream Segregation , 2010 .

[8]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Brain–computer interfacing in disorders of consciousness , 2012, Brain injury.

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: A step towards clinical practice , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[12]  C. Fischer,et al.  Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain–computer interface , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Cerebral response to patient's own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states , 2007, Neurology.

[16]  B. Schoelkopf,et al.  Transition from the locked in to the completely locked-in state: A physiological analysis , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Kübler,et al.  A Brain–Computer Interface Controlled Auditory Event‐Related Potential (P300) Spelling System for Locked‐In Patients , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Marc M. Van Hulle,et al.  Comparison of Classification Methods for P300 Brain-Computer Interface on Disabled Subjects , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[19]  Ian Daly,et al.  On the control of brain-computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Bradley.  Natural selective attention: orienting and emotion. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[21]  A. Kübler,et al.  Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  An online brain-computer interface based on shifting attention to concurrent streams of auditory stimuli. , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  M. Boly,et al.  Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  M. Nuttin,et al.  A brain-actuated wheelchair: Asynchronous and non-invasive Brain–computer interfaces for continuous control of robots , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: Vegetative state and minimally conscious state , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Brice Rebsamen,et al.  A brain controlled wheelchair to navigate in familiar environments. , 2010, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Donatella Mattia,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface as Input Channel for a Standard Assistive Technology Software , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[28]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  G. R. Muller,et al.  Clinical application of an EEG-based brain–computer interface: a case study in a patient with severe motor impairment , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball brain–computer interface for binary choices , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  The auditory p300-based SSBCI: A door to minimally conscious patients? , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[32]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[33]  Olivier Bertrand,et al.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Involved in Auditory Perceptual Organization , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[34]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Predictability of Brain-Computer Communication , 2004 .

[35]  M. Boly,et al.  Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[36]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Towards a Single-Switch BCI Based on Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potentials , 2011 .

[37]  C. Neuper,et al.  Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  Caroline Schnakers,et al.  Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool's gold? , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[40]  Dominique Morlet,et al.  Novelty P3 elicited by the subject’s own name in comatose patients , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  An Auditory Paradigm for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[42]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[43]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[44]  Eric W. Sellers,et al.  New horizons in brain-computer interface research , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.