Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors.

This study quantified and evaluated the variability of sperm head shape for 10 different stallions. Sperm head shape characteristics including sperm head length to width ratio, position of the center of gravity, curvature, and degree of roundness were assessed and analysed from images using elliptic Fourier descriptors and inverse Fourier transformation. The first four principal components accounted for 88.46-92.33% of the total variance and provided a good summary of the overall data. In the case of the ejaculate with defective sperm heads the components accounted for 97.35-98.21% of variation. The study was able to quantitatively confirm that head length to width ratio, which contributed 48.63-53.48% and 71.30-73.34% to the total variance for normal and defective sperm, respectively, was the predominant determining parameter of sperm head shape. There were no statistical significant relationships between Fourier descriptors and values of sperm concentration and/or motility.

[1]  W. Bielański,et al.  Some characteristics of common abnormal forms of spermatozoa in highly fertile stallions. , 1982, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[2]  V. Tuset,et al.  Comparison of three staining techniques for the morphometric study of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) spermatozoa. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[3]  A. J. Soler,et al.  Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples. , 2006, Journal of andrology.

[4]  Seishi Ninomiya,et al.  Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula sieboldii by elliptic fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[5]  P. Casey,et al.  Computer automated morphometric analysis of bull sperm heads. , 1996, Theriogenology.

[6]  Matheus Palhares Viana,et al.  A comparison of morphometric characteristics of sperm from fertile Bos taurus and Bos indicus bulls in Brazil. , 2005, Animal reproduction science.

[7]  Herbert Freeman.  Computer Processing of Line Drawings. , 1973 .

[8]  S. Ninomiya,et al.  Genetic Combining Ability of Petal Shape in Garden Pansy (Viola × wittrockiana Gams) based on Image Analysis , 2006, Euphytica.

[9]  Seishi Ninomiya,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) Leaflet Shape by Principal Component Scores Based on Elliptic Fourier Descriptor , 1995 .

[10]  S. Blottner,et al.  Chromatin condensation in cat spermatozoa during epididymal transit as studied by aniline blue and acridine orange staining , 2009, Andrologia.

[11]  Charles R. Giardina,et al.  Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[12]  C. Soler,et al.  Computer assisted morphometric analysis of ram sperm heads: evaluation of different fixative techniques. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[13]  R. G. Saacke,et al.  Chromatin structural changes in sperm after scrotal insulation of Holstein bulls. , 1997, Journal of andrology.

[14]  R. Oko,et al.  Abnormal Morphology of Bovine Spermatozoa , 1991 .

[15]  H. Rodríguez-Martínez,et al.  Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[16]  Š. Nedomová,et al.  On the evaluation of chicken egg shape variability , 2008 .

[17]  Graham W. Horgan,et al.  The statistical analysis of plant part appearance — a review , 2001 .

[18]  J. Dorado,et al.  Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer. , 2006, Theriogenology.

[19]  Evaluation of tuber shape of yam (Dioscorea alata L.) cultivars by image analysis and elliptic Fourier descriptors. , 2000 .

[20]  H. Iwata,et al.  SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. , 2002, The Journal of heredity.

[21]  Jesús Dorado,et al.  Morphometric classification of Spanish thoroughbred stallion sperm heads. , 2008, Animal reproduction science.

[22]  M. Gomendio,et al.  Inbreeding, fluctuating asymmetry, and ejaculate quality in an endangered ungulate , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  R. Foote,et al.  Determination of the relationship between sperm morphologic classifications and fertility in stallions: 66 cases (1987-1988). , 1990, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[24]  H. Rodríguez-Martínez,et al.  In vitro evaluation of sperm quality related to in vivo function and fertility. , 2007, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[25]  B. Ball,et al.  Morphometry of stallion spermatozoa by computer-assisted image analysis. , 1995, Theriogenology.

[26]  B. Yandell,et al.  Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. , 2001, Journal of andrology.

[27]  Marcelo Emílio Beletti,et al.  A systematic approach to multispecies sperm morphometric characterization. , 2003, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[28]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Shape Classification and Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[29]  C. Soler,et al.  Morphometric characterization and classification of alpaca sperm heads using the sperm-class analyzer computer-assisted system. , 2002, Theriogenology.

[30]  M. McGowan,et al.  Relationship between thirty post-thaw spermatozoal characteristics and the field fertility of 11 high-use Australian dairy AI sires. , 2004, Animal reproduction science.

[31]  B. W. Pickett,et al.  Stallion spermatozoal morphology and motility and their relationships to fertility. , 1981, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[32]  Herbert Freeman,et al.  Computer Processing of Line-Drawing Images , 1974, CSUR.

[33]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FOURIER METHODS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF WING SHAPE IN MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) , 1984 .

[34]  C. Gravance,et al.  Standardization of specimen preparation, staining, and sampling methods improves automated sperm-head morphometry analysis. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[35]  S. Ninomiya,et al.  Diallel Analysis of Leaf Shape Variations of Citrus Varieties Based on Elliptic Fourier Descriptors. , 2002 .

[36]  L. M. Thurston,et al.  Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. , 2001, Journal of andrology.

[37]  AnalysisofPetalShapeVariationofPrimulasieboldiibyEllipticFourierDescriptors and Principal Component Analysis , 2004 .

[38]  A. V. Klaus,et al.  Sperm head morphology in 36 species of artiodactylans, perissodactylans, and cetaceans (Mammalia) , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[39]  G. Ostermeier,et al.  Measurement of bovine sperm nuclear shape using Fourier harmonic amplitudes. , 2001, Journal of andrology.