How Surface Roughness Performance of Printed Parts Manufactured by Desktop FDM 3D Printer with PLA+ is Influenced by Measuring Direction

Design work related to the implementation of new elements requires the use of 3D CAD modelling techniques and rapid prototyping, which makes it possible to accelerate the deployment of new solutions significantly. In this paper, six successful assembly parts are 3D printed with advanced polylactic acid (PLA+) using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method and are expressed by the arithmetic mean surface roughness, Ra. The surface roughness was measured in three different angular directions 0°, 45° and 90° during the investigation along with various independent process parameters of nozzle diameter (0.5, 0.3, 0.2 mm), layer height (0.3, 0.2, 0.1 mm) and other dependent variables, i.e., nozzle temperature (220°C), print speed (30 mm/s) and infill density (0%). Experimental results show that nozzle diameter and layer height play a major role in terms of part quality finish, build time and ultimately part cost. Nozzle diameter and a layer height of 0.3 mm and 0.1 mm, respectively, represent the optimal manufacturing process parameters that can be selected. The surface roughness behaviour does not change and remains relatively constant and follows a similar trend with minor variations for both 45° and 90° measuring angle. Whereas, the surface roughness values are susceptible to 0° measuring direction to the build orientation as compared to other angles.

[1]  L. Avérous,et al.  Poly(lactic acid): plasticization and properties of biodegradable multiphase systems , 2001 .

[2]  L. Love,et al.  Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[3]  M. S. Alsoufi,et al.  Influence of Abrasive Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Surface Texture Quality of Carrara Marble , 2017 .

[4]  Ala Qattawi,et al.  Design Consideration for Additive Manufacturing: Fused Deposition Modelling , 2017 .

[5]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  Expanding the applicability of FDM-type technologies through materials development , 2015 .

[6]  Sunil C. Joshi,et al.  3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability , 2015 .

[7]  Tahani M. Bawazeer,et al.  The Effect of Aggressive Biological Materials on a Painted Automotive Body Surface Roughness , 2015 .

[8]  M. S. Alsoufi,et al.  Experimental Study of Surface Roughness and Micro-Hardness Obtained by Cutting Carbon Steel with Abrasive WaterJet and Laser Beam Technologies , 2016 .

[9]  O. S. Es-Said,et al.  The Effect of Layer Orientation on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of a Polymer , 2011 .

[10]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method , 2009 .

[11]  Yang Yang,et al.  3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication , 2016 .

[12]  Syed H. Masood,et al.  Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for Fused Deposition Modeling , 2011 .

[13]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies , 1998 .

[14]  J. Xi,et al.  A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process , 2007 .

[15]  Tahani M. Bawazeer,et al.  The Effect of Detergents on the Appearance of Automotive Clearcoat Systems Studied in an Outdoor Weathering Test , 2017 .

[16]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling , 2004 .

[17]  Tahani M. Bawazeer,et al.  Quantifying assessment of touch-feel perception: an investigation using stylus base equipment and self-touch , 2016 .

[18]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings , 2017 .

[19]  Brian Derby,et al.  Inkjet printing ceramics: from drops to solid , 2011 .

[20]  Simon Gaisford,et al.  Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines. , 2017, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[21]  B. Hararak,et al.  A study on properties of PLA/PBAT from blown film process , 2015 .

[22]  P. Yuen Embedding objects during 3D printing to add new functionalities. , 2016, Biomicrofluidics.

[23]  S. Arnold,et al.  A Fully Nonmetallic Gas Turbine Engine Enabled by Additive Manufacturing, Part II: Additive Manufacturing and Characterization of Polymer Composites , 2015 .

[24]  Alexander A. Pasko,et al.  Virtual Sculpting and 3D Printing for Young People with Disabilities , 2016, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  Tahani M. Bawazeer,et al.  Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Salvadora persica “Miswak” on the Acid Eroded Enamel Surface at Nano-Mechanical Scale , 2016 .

[26]  Caroline Sunyong Lee,et al.  Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts , 2007 .

[27]  K. J. Stout,et al.  Comprehensive study of parameters for characterizing three-dimensional surface topography I: Some inherent properties of parameter variation , 1992 .

[28]  M. S. Alsoufi,et al.  Studying the Effect of Cutting Conditions in Turning Process on Surface Roughness for Different Materials , 2016 .

[29]  Yong Li,et al.  Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA , 2017 .

[30]  Jingyuan Yan,et al.  Design of injection nozzle in direct metal deposition (DMD) manufacturing of thin-walled structures based on 3D models , 2016 .

[31]  M. S. Alsoufi,et al.  Abrasive WaterJet Machining of Thick Carrara Marble: Cutting Performance vs. Profile, Lagging and WaterJet Angle Assessments , 2017 .

[32]  K. J. Stout,et al.  Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three-dimensional surface topography: IV: Parameters for characterising spatial and hybrid properties , 1994 .

[33]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[34]  M. S. Alsoufi State-of-the-Art in Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Technology and the Promise for Micro- and Nano-Machining , 2017 .

[35]  Prasad Krishna,et al.  STL-less based CAD/CAM Approach for Laser Scanning in Micro Stereo Lithography , 2014 .

[36]  K. J. Stout,et al.  Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three- dimensional surface topography: III: Parameters for characterising amplitude and some functional properties , 1994 .

[37]  G. Rizvi,et al.  Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments , 2008 .

[38]  Andrea Ehrmann,et al.  3D printing of textile-based structures by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials , 2014 .

[39]  Ala Qattawi,et al.  Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach , 2017 .