A genetic analysis of the Virginia opossum mating system: evidence of multiple paternity in a highly fragmented landscape.

Using molecular techniques, we examined patterns of paternity in Virginia opossums occupying a highly fragmented agricultural landscape in northern Indiana. During 2008, we collected tissue from 64 females and their pouch young in 34 forest patches distributed over a 1100-km(2) region. Using genotypes from 10 microsatellite loci, we determined the minimum number of fathers contributing to each litter using GERUD 1.0. Genotyped offspring with known mothers were then analyzed using CERVUS 3.0, incorporating genotypes from 317 males sampled from 2007-2008 to identify potential fathers. Our analyses revealed that promiscuity was common among females, with 26 (41%) litters having > or = 2 sires. Despite the fact that we intensively sampled forest patches for potential fathers, we only were able to identify 13 fathers contributing to 14 litters, with an average Euclidean distance of 18.7 km between father-offspring pairs found in disparate patches (N = 6). Our inability to identify most (85%) fathers of sampled litters, coupled with the extensive distances observed between putative father-offspring pairs, suggests that opossums may not maintain explicit home ranges in highly fragmented landscapes.

[1]  J. Beasley,et al.  Isolation of 21 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) , 2009, Molecular Ecology Resources.

[2]  C. Dickman,et al.  Who's your daddy? Paternity testing reveals promiscuity and multiple paternity in the carnivorous marsupial Dasyurus maculatus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) , 2008 .

[3]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[4]  M. Crowther,et al.  Size breeds success: multiple paternity, multivariate selection and male semelparity in a small marsupial, Antechinus stuartii , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[5]  R. Brooks,et al.  Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  O. Rhodes,et al.  The effects of gene flow and population isolation on the genetic structure of␣reintroduced wild turkey populations: Are genetic signatures of source populations retained? , 2005, Conservation Genetics.

[7]  R. Swihart,et al.  MODELING PATCH OCCUPANCY BY FOREST RODENTS: INCORPORATING DETECTABILITY AND SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION WITH HIERARCHICALLY STRUCTURED DATA , 2005 .

[8]  S. Banks,et al.  The effects of habitat fragmentation on the social kin structure and mating system of the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[9]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Promiscuous females protect their offspring. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  C. Krebs,et al.  Body size, age and paternity in common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[11]  P. Temple-Smith,et al.  Multiple paternity in a field population of a small carnivorous marsupial, the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  D. Paetkau,et al.  Factors influencing paternity success in Antechinus agilis: last‐male sperm precedence, timing of mating and genetic compatibility , 2002 .

[13]  Adam Jones.  gerud1.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from progeny arrays using multilocus DNA data , 2001 .

[14]  J. Kamler,et al.  Survival and Home Ranges of Opossums in Northeastern Kansas , 2001 .

[15]  K. Richardson,et al.  Opportunistic breeding in the polyandrous honey possum, Tarsipes rostratus , 2000 .

[16]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[17]  D. Cooper,et al.  Genetic analysis of the mating system of the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand farmland , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[18]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[19]  J. Hoogland.  Why do female Gunnison's prairie dogs copulate with more than one male? , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Sexual coercion in animal societies , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  R. Kiltie,et al.  First-Cohort Advantage Hypothesis: A New Twist on Facultative Sex Ratio Adjustment , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[22]  A. Møller,et al.  Sperm competition in birds : evolutionary causes and consequences , 1992 .

[23]  Jan Ryser.  The mating system and male mating success of the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) in Florida , 1992 .

[24]  Laurence N. Gillette.  Movement Patterns of Radio-Tagged Opossums in Wisconsin , 1980 .

[25]  H. C. Reynolds.  Some Aspects of the Life History and Ecology of the Opossum in Central Missouri , 1945 .

[26]  D. Lay.  Ecology of the Opossum in Eastern Texas , 1942 .

[27]  J. Beasley,et al.  Relationship between raccoon abundance and crop damage , 2008 .

[28]  B. Thompson,et al.  Wild mammals of North America : biology, management, and conservation , 2003 .

[29]  R. Shine,et al.  Why do female adders copulate so frequently? , 1992, Nature.

[30]  B. Setchell.  Reproduction in male marsupials , 1977 .

[31]  H. C. Reynolds.  Studies on reproduction in the opossum (Didelphis virginiana virginiana) , 1952 .