Hand Position Alters Vision by Modulating the Time Course of Spatial Frequency Use
暂无分享,去创建一个
Frédéric Gosselin | Laurent Caplette | F. Gosselin | B. Wicker | G. West | Bruno Wicker | Greg L West | Laurent Caplette
[1] J. Bullier. Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.
[2] R. Wurtz,et al. Guarding the gateway to cortex: attention in visual thalamus , 2008, Nature.
[3] D. G. Albrecht,et al. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.
[4] B. Hommel,et al. Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions , 2007, Psychological research.
[5] D M Parker,et al. The Spatial Selectivity of Early and Late Waves within the Human Visual Evoked Response , 1977, Perception.
[6] Alison L. Chasteen,et al. Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways , 2012 .
[7] R. Shapley,et al. The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] Thomas A. Carlson,et al. Representational dynamics of object recognition: Feedforward and feedback information flows , 2016, NeuroImage.
[9] J. Pratt,et al. The nature of altered vision near the hands: Evidence for the magnocellular enhancement account from object correspondence through occlusion , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] D. Hubel,et al. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.
[11] R Shapley,et al. Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.
[12] Frédéric Gosselin,et al. Atypical Time Course of Object Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[13] B. Jemel,et al. VEP contrast sensitivity responses reveal reduced functional segregation of mid and high filters of visual channels in autism. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[14] Jay Pratt,et al. Altered visual perception near the hands: A critical review of attentional and neurophysiological models , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[15] Rémy Allard,et al. The noisy-bit method for digital displays: Converting a 256 luminance resolution into a continuous resolution , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[16] Blaire J Weidler,et al. Trade-offs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[17] Greg L. West,et al. Affective and contextual values modulate spatial frequency use in object recognition , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[18] M. Bar. A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[19] A. Oliva,et al. From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .
[20] Jefferson D. Grubb,et al. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[21] V. Lamme,et al. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.
[22] Christopher C. Davoli,et al. Altered vision near the hands , 2008, Cognition.
[23] M. Bar,et al. Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[24] H. Hughes,et al. Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[25] P. Bennett,et al. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.
[26] M. Goodale,et al. Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.
[27] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[28] Philippe G Schyns,et al. Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[29] M. Pinsk,et al. Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[30] S. Goodhew,et al. Contributions of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways to visual perception near the hands are not fixed, but can be dynamically altered , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[31] H. Bekkering,et al. Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.
[32] P. Lennie,et al. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.
[33] Greg O. Horne,et al. Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[34] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[35] A. Wohlschläger,et al. Visual motion priming by invisible actions , 2000, Vision Research.
[36] Catherine L. Reed,et al. Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[37] P Girard,et al. Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.