Hand Position Alters Vision by Modulating the Time Course of Spatial Frequency Use

The nervous system gives preferential treatment to objects near the hands that are candidates for action. It is not yet understood how this process is achieved. Here we show evidence for the mechanism that underlies this process having used an experimental technique that maps the use of spatial frequencies (SFs) during object recognition across time. We used this technique to replicate and characterize with greater precision the coarse-to-fine SF sampling observed in previous studies. Then we show that the visual processing of real-world objects near an observer’s hands is biased toward the use of low-SF information, around 288 ms. Conversely, high-SF information presented around 113 ms impaired object recognition when objects were presented near the hands. Notably, both of these effects happened relatively late during object recognition and suggest that the modulation of SF use by hand position is at least partly attentional in nature.

[1]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[2]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Guarding the gateway to cortex: attention in visual thalamus , 2008, Nature.

[3]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  B. Hommel,et al.  Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions , 2007, Psychological research.

[5]  D M Parker,et al.  The Spatial Selectivity of Early and Late Waves within the Human Visual Evoked Response , 1977, Perception.

[6]  Alison L. Chasteen,et al.  Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways , 2012 .

[7]  R. Shapley,et al.  The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Thomas A. Carlson,et al.  Representational dynamics of object recognition: Feedforward and feedback information flows , 2016, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Pratt,et al.  The nature of altered vision near the hands: Evidence for the magnocellular enhancement account from object correspondence through occlusion , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[11]  R Shapley,et al.  Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Atypical Time Course of Object Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[13]  B. Jemel,et al.  VEP contrast sensitivity responses reveal reduced functional segregation of mid and high filters of visual channels in autism. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[14]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Altered visual perception near the hands: A critical review of attentional and neurophysiological models , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[15]  Rémy Allard,et al.  The noisy-bit method for digital displays: Converting a 256 luminance resolution into a continuous resolution , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[16]  Blaire J Weidler,et al.  Trade-offs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Greg L. West,et al.  Affective and contextual values modulate spatial frequency use in object recognition , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[18]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[20]  Jefferson D. Grubb,et al.  Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  Christopher C. Davoli,et al.  Altered vision near the hands , 2008, Cognition.

[23]  M. Bar,et al.  Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  H. Hughes,et al.  Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Bennett,et al.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[29]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Goodhew,et al.  Contributions of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways to visual perception near the hands are not fixed, but can be dynamically altered , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[31]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.

[32]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[34]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Visual motion priming by invisible actions , 2000, Vision Research.

[36]  Catherine L. Reed,et al.  Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  P Girard,et al.  Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.