Social Network Structures for Explicit, Tacit and Potential Knowledge

The purpose of this conceptual article is to develop argumentation of the knowledge assets of a firm as consisting of three constructs, to extend the conventional explicit, tacit dichotomy by including potential knowledge. The article highlights the role of knowledge, which has so far not been utilized in value creation. The underlying assumption in the article is that knowledge assets can be thought of as embedded in the relationships between individuals in the firm, rather than possessed by single actors. The concept of potential knowledge is explained with selected social network and knowledge management literature. The findings suggest that the ideal social network structure for explicit knowledge is centralized, for tacit knowledge it is distributed, and for potential knowledge decentralized. Practically, the article provides a framework for understanding the connection between knowledge assets and social network structures, thus helping managers of firms in designing suitable social network structures for different types of knowledge.

[1]  Claire McInerney,et al.  Trust in Knowledge Management and Systems in Organizations , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  L. Pereira,et al.  International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations , 2011 .

[3]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[4]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[5]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Murray E. Jennex.  Knowledge Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications , 2007 .

[7]  Pankaj Kamthan,et al.  A Viewpoint-Based Approach for Understanding the Morphogenesis of Patterns , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Joel Podolny.  Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[9]  Peter Busch,et al.  Tacit Knowledge in Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[10]  Patrick van Bommel,et al.  Transformation of Knowledge, Information and Data: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[11]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[12]  James R. Lincoln,et al.  Organizational Structures in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing , 1986 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  Jim Steel,et al.  Declarative Transformation for Object-Oriented Models , 2005 .

[15]  Mirja Iivonen.  Trust building as a management strategy , 2004 .

[16]  Nikos Vrakas,et al.  A Cross Layer Spoofing Detection Mechanism for Multimedia Communication Services , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach.

[17]  J. Klein,et al.  The paradox of using tacit and explicit knowledge: strategies to face dilemmas , 2005 .

[18]  Seung Yoon,et al.  Situated Learning and Activity Theory-based Approach to Designing Integrated Knowledge and Learning Management Systems , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[20]  Peter A. Rosen,et al.  Secure Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 2011, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management.

[21]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[22]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  John S. Edwards,et al.  Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management , 2007 .

[25]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[26]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[27]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[28]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[29]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.