An overview of the Web of Science record of scientific publications (2004–2013) from Nepal: focus on disciplinary diversity and international collaboration

This study attempts to use bibliometry as a tool for exploration of the passage of development of the science and technology through analysis of the scientific publications from a developing country by taking into account its state of higher education and the unique political, economic and geo-bio-environmental conditions. It deals with Nepal considering its scientific output during 1966–2016 reflected as publications indexed in the Web of Science Database. Preliminary examination of the publication record for Nepal reveals a number of the following characteristics: (1) low volume, negligible growth and lack of distinct trend until 1989; (2) a marked growth followed by stagnation linked to political instability during the next 15 years; and (3) recovery and accelerated growth thereafter. Research publications during 2004–2013 increased thrice compared to 1994–2003, with expansion and shifts in disciplinary profile expressed in Essential Science Indicators 22 fields. Detailed bibliometric analysis of the 2004–2013 publications (3011 articles and reviews) from Nepal suggests the citation impact of about the world average, but very high (76%) average international co-authorship. The disciplinary profile is diverse judging from seven most productive fields (clinical medicine, plant and animal science, environment/ecology, geosciences, agricultural sciences, and chemistry) with 4–40% national disciplinary share. Clinical medicine, geosciences and agricultural sciences exhibit relatively high impact. Fields with the smaller share (< 3%), such as molecular biology and genetics, economics and business, psychiatry and psychology, materials science, and biology and biochemistry, exhibit citation impact distinctly higher than the world average. Publications from Nepal show the presence of a vast international collaborative network that is dominated by authors affiliated to institutions in the USA, India, UK, Japan, South Korea and Germany. Based on the analysis of the disciplinary diversity and the national versus global relative disciplinary shares, Nepal’s publication profile is inferred to be a hybrid of the ‘bio-environmental’ and ‘western’ models. Concerning the state of the development of science and technology in Nepal during 2004–2013, the high dependence on international collaboration in the internationally visible publications in most of the bio-environmental, physico-chemical and engineering fields points to basically a ‘building-up stage’. In clinical medicine (with a large share of public health) and geosciences, however, Nepal has demonstrated research strengths evident from the high citation impact in these fields. Moreover, the available data suggest that significant advances were made in higher education sector in both fields during the last 25 years. Despite the notable negative effect of the prolonged domestic armed political conflict on the research activities and acquisition of new data in the field-based sciences, the post-conflict period shows signs of recovery in both domestic and international collaborations leading to again an accelerated growth in scientific publications.

[1]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant , 2010, Scientometrics.

[2]  Stephen J. Bensman The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  P. Adhikari,et al.  The Nepali State and the Dynamics of the Maoist Insurgency , 2013 .

[4]  Pitambar Gautam Detection of Bibliographic Coupling Communities Using Research Output (2004-2013) from Nepal , 2017, 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI).

[5]  N. Reich,et al.  Career intentions of medical students in the setting of Nepal's rapidly expanding private medical education system. , 2012, Health policy and planning.

[6]  R. S. Bajwa,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan , 2012, Scientometrics.

[7]  P. Simkhada,et al.  Health and Medical Research in Nepal: A Bibliometric Review , 2010, Asia-Pacific journal of public health.

[8]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2000, Scientometrics.

[9]  B. M. Gupta,et al.  S&T publications output of Nepal: a quantitative analysis, 2001–10 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[10]  M. Bell,et al.  The state of scientific evidence on air pollution and human health in Nepal. , 2013, Environmental research.

[11]  Hongnian Yu,et al.  Assistive technology for people with dementia: an overview and bibliometric study , 2017, Health information and libraries journal.

[12]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Under-Reporting Research Relevant to Local Needs in The Global South. Database Biases in the Representation of Knowledge on Rice , 2020, ISSI.

[13]  Pitambar Gautam Comparative Analysis of Scientific Publications of Research Entities Using Multiple Disciplinary Classifications , 2016, 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI).

[14]  W. Glänzel BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators , 2003 .

[15]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Visualizing Bibliometric Networks , 2014 .

[16]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[17]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[18]  B. N. Upreti,et al.  Special issue “The 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake and Himalayan studies: First results” , 2017, Earth, Planets and Space.

[19]  Elizabeth S. Vieira,et al.  A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university , 2009, Scientometrics.

[20]  Pitambar Gautam,et al.  Reflection of cross-disciplinary research at Creative Research Institution (Hokkaido University) in the Web of Science database: appraisal and visualization using bibliometry , 2012, Scientometrics.

[21]  I. Meijer,et al.  Scientific research on diseases: the distinct profile of developed and developing countries , 2016 .