Bayesian Adaptive Biased‐Coin Designs for Clinical Trials with Normal Responses

Adaptive designs are used in phase III clinical trials for skewing the allocation pattern toward the better treatments. We use optimum design theory to derive a skewed Bayesian biased-coin procedure for sequential designs with continuous responses. The skewed designs are used to provide adaptive designs, the performance of which is studied numerically and theoretically. Important properties are loss and the proportion of allocation to the better treatment.

[1]  W. Rosenberger,et al.  Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[2]  R. Gelber,et al.  Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotic Inference with Response-Adaptive Treatment Allocation Designs , 1993 .

[4]  D. R. Cox,et al.  A note on design when response has an exponential family distribution , 1988 .

[5]  L. J. Wei,et al.  Exact two-sample permutation tests based on the randomized play-the-winner rule , 1988 .

[6]  Colin B. Begg,et al.  On inferences from Wei's biased coin design for clinical trials , 1990 .

[7]  Douglas E. Faries,et al.  A Case Study of an Adaptive Clinical Trial in the Treatment of Out-Patients with Depressive Disorder , 1994 .

[8]  Uttam Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Adaptive designs for normal responses with prognostic factors , 2001 .

[9]  A. Atkinson Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors , 1982 .

[10]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Estimation for an adaptive allocation design , 1997 .

[11]  N Stallard,et al.  Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[12]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Adaptive designs for Clinical Trials with delayed Response , 2002 .

[13]  Carl-Fredrik Burman,et al.  On Sequential Treatment Allocations in Clinical Trials , 1996 .

[14]  Alessandra Giovagnoli,et al.  On the Large Sample Optimality of Sequential Designs for Comparing Two or More Treatments , 2005 .

[15]  L. J. Wei,et al.  Statistical Inference with Data-Dependent Treatment Allocation Rules , 1990 .

[16]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  The comparison of designs for sequential clinical trials with covariate information , 2002 .

[17]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Horwitz's rule, transforming both sides and the design of experiments for mechanistic models , 2003 .

[18]  J. N. S. Matthews,et al.  An introduction to randomized controlled clinical trials , 2000 .

[19]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  Play the winner for phase II/III clinical trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Optimality, Variability, Power , 2003 .

[21]  Isabella Verdinelli,et al.  Biased coin designs with a Bayesian bias , 1993 .