AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT 1

: The separation of the base flow component from a varying streamflow hydrograph is called “hydrograph analysis.” In this study, two digital filter based separation modules, the BFLOW and Eckhardt filters, were incorporated into the Web based Hydrograph Analysis Tool (WHAT) system. A statistical component was also developed to provide fundamental information for flow frequency analysis and time series analysis. The Web Geographic Information System (GIS) version of the WHAT system accesses and uses U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) daily streamflow data from the USGS web server. The results from the Eckhardt filter method were compared with the results from the BFLOW filter method that was previously validated, since measured base flow data were not available for this study. Following validation, the two digital filter methods in the WHAT system were run for 50 Indiana gaging stations. The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient values comparing the results of the two digital filter methods were over 0.91 for all 50 gaging stations, suggesting the filtered base flow using the Eckhardt filter method will typically match measured base flow. Manual separation of base flow from streamflow can lead to inconsistency in the results, while the WHAT system provides consistent results in less than a minute. Although base flow separation algorithms in the WHAT system cannot consider reservoir release and snowmelt that can affect stream hydrographs, the Web based WHAT system provides an efficient tool for hydrologic model calibration and validation. The base flow information from the WHAT system can also play an important role for sustainable ground water and surface water exploitation, including irrigation and industrial uses, and estimation of pollutant loading from both base flow and direct runoff. Thus, best management practices can be appropriately applied to reduce and intercept pollutant leaching if base flow contributes significant amounts of pollutants to the stream. This Web GIS based system also demonstrates how remote, distributed resources can be shared through the Internet using Web programming.

[1]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin , 2000 .

[2]  F. Doležal,et al.  The role of recharge zones, discharge zones, springs and tile drainage systems in peneplains of Central European highlands with regard to water quality generation processes , 2003 .

[3]  Keith E. Schilling,et al.  Baseflow contribution to nitrate-nitrogen export from a large, agricultural watershed, USA , 2004 .

[4]  Tg Chapman,et al.  Baseflow Separation - Comparison of Numerical Methods with Tracer Experiments , 1996 .

[5]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[6]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Automated Base Flow Separation and Recession Analysis Techniques , 1995 .

[7]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[8]  J. Arnold,et al.  AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS 1 , 1999 .

[9]  K. Eckhardt How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation , 2005 .

[10]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[11]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[12]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  Comment on Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses by R. J. Nathan , 1991 .

[13]  Ronald A. Sloto,et al.  HYSEP: A Computer Program for Streamflow Hydrograph Separation and Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  Extension and enhancement of national agricultural pesticide risk analysis (NAPRA) WWW decision support system to include nutrients , 2003 .

[15]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  INTEGRATION OF A BASIN‐SCALE WATER QUALITY MODEL WITH GIS , 1994 .