Pairwise efficiency: a new mathematical approach to qPCR data analysis increases the precision of the calibration curve assay

BackgroundThe real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is routinely used for quantification of nucleic acids and is considered the gold standard in the field of relative nucleic acid measurements. The efficiency of the qPCR reaction is one of the most important parameters in data analysis in qPCR experiments. The Minimum Information for publication of Quantitative real-time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines recommends the calibration curve as the method of choice for estimation of qPCR efficiency. The precision of this method has been reported to be between SD = 0.007 (three replicates) and SD = 0.022 (no replicates).ResultsIn this article, we present a novel approach to the analysis of qPCR data which has been obtained by running a dilution series. Unlike previously developed methods, our method, Pairwise Efficiency, involves a new formula that describes pairwise relationships between data points on separate amplification curves and thus enables extensive statistics. The comparison of Pairwise Efficiency with the calibration curve by Monte Carlo simulation shows the two-folds improvement in the precision of estimations of efficiency and gene expression ratios on the same dataset.ConclusionsThe Pairwise Efficiency nearly doubles the precision in qPCR efficiency determinations compared to standard calibration curve method. This paper demonstrates that applications of combinatorial treatment of data provide the improvement of the determination.

[1]  S. Moore,et al.  Robust Quantification of Polymerase Chain Reactions Using Global Fitting , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  H. D. Vanguilder,et al.  Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[3]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  Dejian Lai,et al.  A New Method for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Data Analysis , 2013, J. Comput. Biol..

[5]  Russell Higuchi,et al.  Kinetic PCR Analysis: Real-time Monitoring of DNA Amplification Reactions , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[6]  Tingting Wang,et al.  A fixed-point algorithm for estimating amplification efficiency from a polymerase chain reaction dilution series , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Xuelin Huang,et al.  An improvement of the 2ˆ(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. , 2013, Biostatistics, bioinformatics and biomathematics.

[8]  Jan Hellemans,et al.  Evaluation of qPCR curve analysis methods for reliable biomarker discovery: bias, resolution, precision, and implications. , 2013, Methods.

[9]  A. Moorman,et al.  Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Benedict G. Archer Note on the PCR threshold standard curve , 2017, BMC Research Notes.

[11]  Don Stewart,et al.  Critical evaluation of methods used to determine amplification efficiency refutes the exponential character of real-time PCR , 2008, BMC Molecular Biology.

[12]  M. Pfaffl Chapter 3 : Quantification strategies in real-time PCR , 2004 .

[13]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Validities of mRNA quantification using recombinant RNA and recombinant DNA external calibration curves in real-time RT-PCR , 2001, Biotechnology Letters.

[14]  S. Van Aelst,et al.  Enhanced analysis of real-time PCR data by using a variable efficiency model: FPK-PCR , 2011, Nucleic Acids Research.

[15]  Michele Guescini,et al.  A new real-time PCR method to overcome significant quantitative inaccuracy due to slight amplification inhibition , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  A. Spiess,et al.  Comparing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis methods for precision, linearity, and accuracy of estimating amplification efficiency. , 2014, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  Christian Ritz,et al.  Highly accurate sigmoidal fitting of real-time PCR data by introducing a parameter for asymmetry , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  Tomonobu M. Watanabe,et al.  Gene dynamics of core transcription factors for pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. , 2015, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[19]  Peter J. Woolf,et al.  A Mechanistic Model of PCR for Accurate Quantification of Quantitative PCR Data , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Don Stewart,et al.  Assessing the Performance Capabilities of LRE-Based Assays for Absolute Quantitative Real-Time PCR , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  S. Bustin,et al.  Quantification strategies in real-time PCR , 2008 .

[24]  Mikael Kubista,et al.  How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: Recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments , 2015, Biomolecular detection and quantification.

[25]  Ales Tichopad,et al.  Validation of kinetics similarity in qPCR , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Sheng Zhao,et al.  Comprehensive Algorithm for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , 2005, J. Comput. Biol..