Peri-ictal Normalization of Visual Cortex Excitability in Migraine: an MEG Study

To delineate if the change in cortical excitability persists across migraine attacks, visual evoked magnetic fields (VEF) were measured in patients with migraine without aura during the interictal (n = 26) or peri-ictal (n = 21) periods, and were compared with 30 healthy controls. The visual stimuli were checkerboard reversals with four different check sizes (15',30',60' and 120'). For each check size, five sequential blocks of 50 VEF responses were recorded to calculate the percentage change of the P100m amplitude in the second to the fifth blocks in comparison with the first block. At check size 120', interictal patients showed a larger amplitude increment than controls [28.1 ± 38.3% (S.D.) vs. 8.7 ± 21.3%] in the second block and a larger increment than peri-ictal patients in the second (28.1 ± 38.3% vs. -3.2 ± 19.2%), fourth (22.7 ± 31.2% vs. -5.7 ± 22.3%) and fifth (20.5 ± 30.4% vs. -10.8 ± 30.1%) blocks (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference at other check sizes or between peri-ictal patients and controls. In conclusion, there may be peri-ictal normalization of visual cortical excitability changes in migraine that is dependent on the spatial frequency of the stimuli and reflects a dynamic modulation of cortical activities.

[1]  E. Hamel,et al.  Sumatriptan normalizes the migraine attack-related increase in brain serotonin synthesis , 2008, Neurology.

[2]  T. Yeh,et al.  Optimal Check Size and Reversal Rate to Elicit Pattern-reversal MEG Responses , 2005, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[3]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[4]  H. Göbel,et al.  Comparison of Contingent Negative Variation Between Migraine Interval and Migraine Attack Before and After Treatment With Sumatriptan , 1993, Headache.

[5]  L. Stovner,et al.  Visual evoked potential latency, amplitude and habituation in migraine: A longitudinal study , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  H J Keselman,et al.  The analysis of repeated measures designs in medical research. , 1984, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Habituation of visual and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials tends to normalize just before and during the migraine attack. , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[8]  J. Olesen The International Classification of Headache Disorders , 2008, Headache.

[9]  D. Badcock,et al.  Visual dysfunction between migraine events. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Visual evoked potentials during long periods of pattern-reversal stimulation in migraine. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  J. Lötsch,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  J. Olesen,et al.  A nosographic analysis of the migraine aura in a general population. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  G. Benedek,et al.  Spatial Contrast Sensitivity of Migraine Patients Without Aura , 2002, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[14]  N Nakasato,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence that the P100 component of the pattern reversal visual evoked response originates in the bottom of the calcarine fissure. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks , 1995, European journal of neurology.

[16]  D. Anderson,et al.  Long term decline of P100 amplitude in migraine with aura , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  G. Barrett,et al.  A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response , 1976, Nature.

[18]  J. Passchier,et al.  Interictal and Postictal Contingent Negative Variation in Migraine Without Aura , 2001, Headache.

[19]  Georg Juckel,et al.  Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials as an indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: A new hypothesis , 1993, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  J. Fuh,et al.  Validity, reliability and application of the taiwan version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire. , 2006, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[21]  G. Celesia Evoked potential techniques in the evaluation of visual function. , 1984, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[22]  P. Groves,et al.  Habituation: a dual-process theory. , 1970, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  E. Bonanni,et al.  Asymmetric scalp distribution of pattern visual evoked potentials during interictal phases in migraine , 2001, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[25]  G Bernardi,et al.  Multichannel visual evoked potentials in migraine. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Electrophysiological response patterns of primary sensory cortices in migraine , 2006, The Journal of Headache and Pain.

[27]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[28]  C. Yücesan,et al.  Influence of Disease Duration on Visual Evoked Potentials in Migraineurs , 2000, Headache.

[29]  T. Sand,et al.  Visual, Long-Latency Auditory and Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Migraine: Relation to Pattern Size, Stimulus Intensity, Sound and Light Discomfort Thresholds and Pre-Attack State , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[30]  B. Rosen,et al.  Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  G. Fein,et al.  Effect of Photic Stimulation on Human Visual Cortex Lactate and Phosphates Using 1H and 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[32]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Deficient habituation of evoked cortical potentials in migraine: a link between brain biology, behavior and trigeminovascular activation? , 1996, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[33]  M. Ferrari,et al.  On Serotonin and Migraine: A Clinical and Pharmacological Review , 1993, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[34]  M S Hale,et al.  Spectral analysis of photic stimulation in migraine. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  C T White,et al.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Comparison of visual and auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine patients between attacks , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability , 1999, Neurology.

[38]  Norman Tepley,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic fields from patients with spontaneous and induced migraine aura , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[39]  K M Hay,et al.  1044 Women with Migraine: The Effect of Environmental Stimuli , 1994, Headache.

[40]  M. Osawa,et al.  Simultaneous Recording of Pattern Reversal Electroretinograms and Visual Evoked Potentials in Migraine , 1997, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[41]  G. Coppola,et al.  Is The Cerebral Cortex Hyperexcitable or Hyperresponsive in Migraine? , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[42]  A. Shepherd Visual Contrast Processing in Migraine , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[43]  M. Iwata,et al.  Evaluating the effects of spatial frequency on migraines by using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  Y. Ozkul,et al.  Effects of Fluoxetine on Habituation of Pattern Reversal Visually Evoked Potentials in Migraine Prophylaxis , 2002, Headache.

[45]  S. Evers,et al.  Dynamic Changes of Cognitive Habituation and Serotonin Metabolism During the Migraine Interval , 1999, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[46]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[47]  Neal S. Peachey,et al.  Short-term changes in the response characteristics of the human visual evoked potential , 1994, Vision Research.

[48]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  R. Lipton,et al.  An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score , 1999, Neurology.

[50]  A. Gantenbein,et al.  Physiological Parameters as Biomarkers of Migraine , 2006, Headache.

[51]  S. Aurora,et al.  The Brain is Hyperexcitable in Migraine , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.