Second Law Efficiency of the Rankine Bottoming Cycle of a Combined Cycle Power Plant

A significant portion of the new electrical generating capacity installed in the past decade has employed heavy-duty gas turbines operating in a combined cycle configuration with a steam turbine bottoming cycle. In these power plants approximately one-third of the power is generated by the bottoming cycle. To ensure that the highest possible combined cycle efficiency is realized it is important to develop the combined cycle power plant as a system. Doing so requires a solid understanding of the efficiency entitlement of both, topping and bottoming, cycles separately and as a whole. This paper describes a simple but accurate method to estimate the Rankine bottoming cycle power output directly from the gas turbine exhaust exergy, utilizing the second law of thermodynamics. The classical first law approach, i.e., the heat and mass balance method, requires lengthy calculations and complex computer-based modeling tools to evaluate Rankine bottoming cycle performance. In this paper, a rigorous application of the fundamental thermodynamic principles embodied by the second law to the major cycle components clearly demonstrates that the Rankine cycle performance can be accurately represented by several key parameters. The power of the second law approach lies in its ability to highlight the theoretical entitlement and state-of-the-art design performances simultaneously via simple fundamental relationships. By considering economically and technologically feasible upper limits for the key parameters, the maximum achievable bottoming cycle power output is readily calculable for any given gas turbine from its exhaust exergy.

[1]  J. B. Young,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Modern Fossil-Fuel Power Plants , 2000 .

[2]  M. El-Masri On Thermodynamics of Gas-Turbine Cycles: Part 2—A Model for Expansion in Cooled Turbines , 1986 .

[3]  Raub Warfield Smith,et al.  Fuel Moisturization for Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles , 2005 .

[4]  Walter Jury,et al.  Process Optimization of an Integrated Combined Cycle — The Impact and Benefit of Sequential Combustion , 1997 .

[5]  M. A. El-Masri On Thermodynamics of Gas-Turbine Cycles: Part 1—Second Law Analysis of Combined Cycles , 1985 .

[6]  J. Warner,et al.  Combined - Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants , 1999 .

[7]  Henry Cohen,et al.  Gas turbine theory , 1973 .

[8]  John E. Pritchard H System™ Technology Update , 2003 .

[9]  A. I. Kalina,et al.  Combined-Cycle System With Novel Bottoming Cycle , 1984 .

[10]  S. Can Gülen,et al.  Efficiency Entitlement for Bottoming Cycles , 2006 .

[11]  J. Young,et al.  Modeling the Air-Cooled Gas Turbine: Part 1—General Thermodynamics , 2002 .

[12]  W. W. Chin,et al.  Exergy analysis of combined cycles: Part 2 - Analysis and optimization of two-pressure steam bottoming cycles , 1987 .

[13]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  A Thermodynamic Analysis of Different Options to Break 60% Electric Efficiency in Combined Cycle Power Plants , 2004 .

[14]  P. J. Dechamps Advanced Combined Cycle Alternatives With the Latest Gas Turbines , 1998 .

[15]  M. A. El-Masri A Modified, High-Efficiency, Recuperated Gas-Turbine Cycle , 1988 .

[16]  Dieter Bohn SFB 561 : Aiming for 65% CC efficiency with an air-cooled GT , 2006 .

[17]  Akber Pasha,et al.  Thermal and Economic Considerations for Optimizing HRSG Design , 2002 .