Microbiological and chemical properties of soil associated with macropores at different depths in a red-duplex soil in NSW Australia

Some agricultural soils in South Eastern Australia with duplex profiles have subsoils with high bulk density, which may limit root penetration, water uptake and crop yield. In these soils, a large proportion (up to 80%) of plant roots maybe preferentially located within the macropores or in the soil within 1–10 mm of the macropores, a zone defined as the macropore sheath (MPS). The chemical and microbiological properties of MPS soil manually dissected from a 1–3 mm wide region surrounding the macropores was compared with that of adjacent bulk soil (>10 mm from macropores) at 4 soil depths (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, 40–60 cm and 60–80 cm). Compared to the bulk soil, the MPS soil had higher organic C, total N, bicarbonate-extractable P, Ca+, Cu, Fe and Mn and supported higher populations of bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., cellulolytic bacteria, cellulolytic fungi, nitrifying bacteria and the root pathogen Pythium.In addition, analysis of carbon substrate utilization patterns showed the microbial community associated with the MPS soil to have higher metabolic activity and greater functional diversity than the microbial community associated with the bulk soil at all soil depths. Phospholipid fatty acids associated with bacteria and fungi were also shown to be present in higher relative amounts in the MPS soil compared to the bulk soil. Whilst populations of microbial functional groups in the MPS and the bulk soil declined with increasing soil depth, the differentiation between the two soils in microbiological properties occurred at all soil depths. Soil aggregates (< 0.5 mm diameter) associated with plant roots located within macropores were found to support a microbial community that was quantitatively and functionally different to that in the MPS soil and the bulk soil at all soil depths. The microbial community associated with these soil aggregates thus represented a third recognizable environment for plant roots and microorganisms in the subsoil.

[1]  S. Bellgard The topsoil as the major store of the propagules of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in southeast Australian sandstone soils , 1993, Mycorrhiza.

[2]  J. B. Passioura,et al.  Soil structure and plant growth: Impact of bulk density and biopores , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[3]  Bronwyn Harch,et al.  Using the Gini coefficient with BIOLOG substrate utilisation data to provide an alternative quantitative measure for comparing bacterial soil communities , 1997 .

[4]  C. Pankhurst,et al.  Influence of tillage and crop rotation on the epidemiology of Pythium infections of wheat in a red-brown earth of South Australia , 1995 .

[5]  T. G. Piearce,et al.  Earthworms, Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use. , 1987 .

[6]  S. Prasher,et al.  A two-domain approach using CAT scanning to model solute transport in soil , 2000 .

[7]  M. Ali-Shtayeh,et al.  An improved method and medium for quantitative estimates of populations of Pythium species from soil , 1986 .

[8]  L. Elsgaard,et al.  Microbial biomass and numbers of denitrifiers related to macropore channels in agricultural and forest soils , 1999 .

[9]  G. Brown How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity , 1995 .

[10]  C. Pankhurst,et al.  Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health , 1995 .

[11]  P. Grace,et al.  The introduction and management of earthworms to improve soil structure and fertility in south-eastern Australia. , 1994 .

[12]  D. Chittleborough,et al.  Phosphorus movement down a toposequence from a landscape with texture contrast soils , 1997 .

[13]  E. C. Berry,et al.  Microbial nitrogen transformations in earthworm burrows , 1999 .

[14]  Daniel P. Rasse,et al.  Root recolonization of previous root channels in corn and alfalfa rotations , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[15]  C. Moran,et al.  Differentiation of soil properties related to the spatial association of wheat roots and soil macropores , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[16]  J. Kirkegaard,et al.  Subsoil amelioration by plant roots : the process and the evidence , 1995 .

[17]  B. Harch,et al.  Capacity of fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns to describe differences in soil microbial communities associated with increased salinity or alkalinity at three locations in South Australia , 2001, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[18]  S. Scheu,et al.  Microbial respiration, biomass, biovolume and nutrient status in burrow walls of Lumbricus terrestris L. (Lumbricidae) , 1999 .

[19]  C. Moran,et al.  Macropore sheath: quantification of plant root and soil macropore association , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[20]  H. Di,et al.  Effect of macropore flow on the transport of surface-applied cow urine through a soil profile , 2000 .

[21]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming , 1997 .

[22]  Z H Bhuiya,et al.  Autotrophic nitrifying bacteria in acid tea soils from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. , 1977, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[23]  M. Alexander Introduction to Soil Microbiology , 1978 .

[24]  Pål Axel Olsson Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil , 1999 .

[25]  R. Aiken,et al.  Root system regulation of whole plant growth. , 1996, Annual review of phytopathology.

[26]  K. E. Lee,et al.  Identification and manipulation of soil biopores for the management of sub-soil problems , 1994 .

[27]  S. Allen,et al.  Patterns of arbuscular mycorrhiza down the profile of a heavy textured soil do not reflect associated colonization potential , 1999 .

[28]  G. E. Rayment,et al.  Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. , 1992 .

[29]  P. Lavelle,et al.  Earthworm activities and the soil system , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.