Determination of sex from the metacarpals in a Thai population.

Determination of sex using metacarpals was carried out on a sample of 249 skeletons from a Thai population (154 males and 95 females), ranging in age from 19 to 93 years. Six measurements were taken on each metacarpal, namely maximum length, medio-lateral base width, antero-posterior base height, medio-lateral head width, antero-posterior head height and mid-shaft diameter. Binary logistic regression equations were calculated for determining sex from these measurements. All metacarpals from both sides produced at least one equation that correctly allocated the skeletons with 80% or greater accuracy. In a comparative test using only individuals with no missing measurements (n=196), the most accurate equations for each metacarpal on the right side had pooled allocation accuracies ranging from 85.2% to 89.3%, with the best equation based on three measurements from the 5th metacarpal. On the left side, the most accurate equations for each metacarpal ranged from 83.2% to 89.8% correct allocation, with the best equation based on three measurements of the 2nd metacarpal. When the allocation accuracy for each sex is considered in addition to the pooled accuracy, the best equations involve the same three measurements of the 5th metacarpal on the right side, but shift to three measurements of the first metacarpal on the left side, with a pooled accuracy of 88.3%. The results of this study suggest that metacarpals can be used quite reliably for sexing in forensic contexts in Thailand.

[1]  S. Lewis Metacarpophalangeal pattern profile analysis of a sample drawn from a North Wales population , 2001, Annals of human biology.

[2]  A. Falsetti,et al.  Sex assessment from metacarpals of the human hand. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Sheena Harris,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Tarsal Bones: Implications for Sex Determination , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Meta‐analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand , 2010, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[5]  J L Scheuer,et al.  Sex determination from metacarpals and the first proximal phalanx. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  D. McFadden,et al.  Sex and race differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in human skeletons. , 2009, Early human development.

[7]  M. Işcan,et al.  Sex determination from the ribs of contemporary Turks. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  G. Trancho,et al.  Metacarpal Sexual Determination in a Spanish Population , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  J. Stewart,et al.  Sexing of human clavicles using length and circumference measurements. , 1991, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[10]  R. Janaway,et al.  Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science , 1987 .

[11]  C. Stojanowski Sexing potential of fragmentary and pathological metacarpals. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  E. Marino Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra. , 1995, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  V Page Zanella,et al.  Testing the validity of metacarpal use in sex assessment of human skeletal remains. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  P. Mahakkanukrauh,et al.  Thai Sexing and Vertebral Column , 2001 .

[15]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  P. Mahakkanukrauh,et al.  Northern Thai Radius and Sexing , 2004 .

[17]  C. A. King,et al.  Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  T. Kanchan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of the human sternum in a Maharashtrian population of India: a morphometric analysis. , 2008, Legal medicine.

[19]  Martin Voracek,et al.  Why digit ratio (2D:4D) is inappropriate for sex determination in medicolegal investigations. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[20]  Maja Pohar Perme,et al.  Comparison of logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis , 2004, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[21]  Luis Ríos Frutos Determination of sex from the clavicle and scapula in a Guatemalan contemporary rural indigenous population. , 2002, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[22]  Aytaç Koçak,et al.  Sex determination from the sternal end of the rib by osteometric analysis. , 2003, Legal medicine.

[23]  C A Roe,et al.  Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[24]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[25]  C. Eliopoulos,et al.  Sex determination using metacarpal biometric data from the Athens Collection. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[26]  D H Ubelaker,et al.  Sex estimation from the metatarsals. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  E. F. Harris,et al.  Metacarpophalangeal length changes in humans during adulthood: a longitudinal study. , 1992, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  R. Lazenby,et al.  Identification of sex from metacarpals: effect of side asymmetry. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the humerus: a comparative analysis of Chinese, Japanese and Thais. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[30]  F Introna,et al.  Sex determination by discriminant analysis of patella measurements. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[31]  E. Gualdi-Russo Sex determination from the talus and calcaneus measurements. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[32]  S L Smith,et al.  Attribution of hand bones to sex and population groups. , 1996, Journal of forensic sciences.

[33]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[34]  Ann H Ross,et al.  Sex Determination from Hand and Foot Bone Lengths * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[35]  S. Smith Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.