Effect of pretreatment by permanganate/chlorine on algae fouling control for ultrafiltration (UF) membrane system

Abstract The use of ultrafiltration (UF) is receiving more attention for drinking water treatment, but its fouling remains a problem. Reservoir water was selected as raw water during pilot study. Worldwide drinking water reservoirs may contain algae, which pose a threat to drinking water treatment. UF membrane has been recognized that it can remove algae for its nominal pore sizes. The algal cells cumulate on membrane surface, and the secretion released by them would cause transmembrane pressure increases or flux decreases. Also, conventional backwashing could not satisfy with the need of flux recovery. Frequent chemical cleaning may shorten the membrane unit’s service life. The best available technology for UF membrane system during algae bloom should be inactivating algae and removing them before they are fed into UF membrane. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of pretreatment by permanganate/chlorine on UF membrane operation for controlling algae fouling. It was found that combined use of permanganate and chlorine could reduce the rate of UF membrane fouling. Permanganate and chlorine could be in synergistic action in inactivating algal cell. The intermediate of permanganate, hydrous manganese dioxide (MnO2) could adsorb on algal cells depending on its strong specific surface area. In addition to permeate water quality, specific flux (at constant TMP) and TMP (at constant flux) of UF membrane also demonstrated that pretreatment could improve UF membrane system.

[1]  J. Chen,et al.  The mechanisms of potassium permanganate on algae removal. , 2005, Water research.

[2]  Jeyong Yoon,et al.  Enhanced disinfection efficiency of mechanically mixed oxidants with free chlorine. , 2005, Water research.

[3]  C. Haas,et al.  Inactivation of E. coli by combined action of free chlorine and monochloramine , 1991 .

[4]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Effect of algae on fouling and efficiency of UF membranes , 2005 .

[5]  Y. Choi,et al.  Comparison of membrane permeability and a fouling mechanism by pre-ozonation followed by membrane filtration and residual ozone in membrane cells , 2005 .

[6]  K. Farahbakhsh,et al.  Performance comparison and pretreatment evaluation of three water treatment membrane pilot plants treating low turbidity water , 2002 .

[7]  J. Plummer,et al.  Effect of ozone on algae as precursors for trihalomethane and haloacetic acid production. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  M. Tomaszewska,et al.  Application of an ozonation–adsorption–ultrafiltration system for surface water treatment , 2006 .

[9]  J. Plummer,et al.  Effects of chlorine and ozone on algal cell properties and removal of algae by coagulation , 2002 .

[10]  J. Rouch,et al.  Impact of coagulation conditions on the in-line coagulation/UF process for drinking water production☆ , 2002 .

[11]  K. Biswas,et al.  Synergistic inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum using ozone followed by free chlorine in natural water. , 2003, Water research.

[13]  K. Choo,et al.  Effect of chlorine on adsorption/ultrafiltration treatment for removing natural organic matter in drinking water. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[14]  I. Nir,et al.  Effect of oxidants on microalgal flocculation , 1987 .

[15]  C. Gerba,et al.  Synergistic inactivation of Escherichia coli and MS-2 coliphage by chloramine and cupric chloride , 1995 .

[16]  G. Alaerts,et al.  EFFECT OF PERMANGANATE PRE-TREATMENT AND COAGULATION WITH DUAL COAGULANTS ON ALGAE REMOVAL IN DIRECT FILTRATION , 1996 .

[17]  P. Swart,et al.  Feed-water pretreatment: methods to reduce membrane fouling by natural organic matter , 1999 .

[18]  J. Qin,et al.  Reservoir water treatment using hybrid coagulation–ultrafiltration , 2006 .