Monte Carlo Bias Field Correction in Endorectal Diffusion Imaging

Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the male population. The detection of prostate cancer using imaging has been challenging until recently. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to allow accurate localization of the cancers and can help direct biopsies to cancer foci, which is required to plan the treatment. The interpretation of MRI, however, requires a high level of expertise and review of large multiparametric datasets. An endorectal receiver coil is often used to improve signal-to-noise ratio and aid in detection of smaller cancer foci. Moreover, computed high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging show improved delineation of tumors but is subject to strong bias fields near the coil. Here, a nonparametric approach to bias field correction for endorectal diffusion imaging via Monte Carlo sampling is introduced. It will be shown that the delineation between the prostate gland and the background and intensity inhomogeneity may be improved using the proposed approach. High b-value generated results also show improved visualization of tumor regions. The results suggest that Monte Carlo bias correction may have potential as a preprocessing tool for endorectal diffusion images for the prostate cancer detection and localization or segmentation.

[1]  K. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[3]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Zujun Hou,et al.  A Review on MR Image Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction , 2006, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[5]  C. Kim,et al.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[7]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Comparison of MRI with CT for the radiotherapy planning of prostate cancer: a feasibility study. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Quantitative investigative analysis of tumour separability in the prostate gland using ultra-high b-value computed diffusion imaging , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Optimized homomorphic unsharp masking for MR grayscale inhomogeneity correction , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  T. Metens,et al.  What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T? , 2012, European Radiology.

[11]  L. Axel,et al.  Intensity correction in surface-coil MR imaging. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Shang-Hong Lai,et al.  A new variational shape-from-orientation approach to correcting intensity inhomogeneities in magnetic resonance images , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Suyash P. Awate,et al.  Automatic Correction of Intensity Nonuniformity from Sparseness of Gradient Distribution in Medical Images , 2009, MICCAI.

[14]  E Bellon,et al.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  John W. Fisher,et al.  A Unified Variational Approach to Denoising and Bias Correction in MR , 2003, IPMI.

[16]  J. Crowley,et al.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Matthew R Cooperberg,et al.  Serum prostate-specific antigen for the early detection of prostate cancer: always, never, or only sometimes? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Bum Soo Kim,et al.  Comparison of Pelvic Phased-Array versus Endorectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer , 2012, Yonsei medical journal.

[19]  Hugues Benoit-Cattin,et al.  Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: Existing methods and their validation , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[21]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[22]  I Mehdi,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[23]  Ming-Hui Chen Importance-Weighted Marginal Bayesian Posterior Density Estimation , 1994 .

[24]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  H Alberto Vargas,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[26]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Chunming Li,et al.  A Level Set Method for Image Segmentation in the Presence of Intensity Inhomogeneities With Application to MRI , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  L. Turnbull,et al.  A simple method for the correction of endorectal surface coil inhomogeneity in prostate imaging , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  P. Scardino,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[30]  N D Gelber,et al.  Surface coil MR imaging: utility of image intensity correction filter. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Patrick C. Walsh,et al.  Prevalence of Prostate Cancer Among Men With a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per Milliliter , 2004 .

[32]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Correction of intensity variations in MR images for computer-aided tissue classification , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[35]  A R Padhani,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new functional clinical technique for tumour imaging. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  N. deSouza,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER : VALUE OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS FOR IDENTIFYING MALIGNANT NODULES , 2010 .

[37]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  Review and evaluation of MRI nonuniformity corrections for brain tumor response measurements. , 1998, Medical physics.

[38]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Fernando J. Kim,et al.  Combined T 2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer , 2007 .