Educational Outcomes, Modern and Postmodern Interpretations: Response to Smyth and Dow

Drawing on research in Canada as well as studies in Australia and elsewhere, this paper challenges the arguments of Smyth and Dow (British Journal of Sociology in Education, 19(3), pp. 291-303) that outcomes-based education necessarily embodies a form of technical rationality which routinizes, proletarianizes and deskills teachers and their work. This paper criticizes Smyth and Dow for applying a universalistic and monolithic labour process theory to outcomes issues, for paying little or no attention to published evidence and argument on outcomes, and for being insensitive to the variable geometries of the outcomes phenomenon across different contexts. This paper, by contrast, identifies how investigating outcomes in a context of socialist policy-making, where equity goals are explicit and high discretion is granted to teachers, can contribute to clearer understanding of the variable postmodern geometries and educational possibilities of outcomes technology. These possibilities include fostering stronger collegiality among teachers, and democratic inclusion of pupils and parents in the teaching and learning process.

[1]  William G. Spady,et al.  Beyond traditional outcome-based education , 1991 .

[2]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  What's Worth Fighting for in Your School? Revised Edition. , 1996 .

[3]  J. Pimlott,et al.  Parents and teachers , 1976 .

[4]  Ivor Goodson,et al.  Teachers’ Professional Lives: Aspirations and Actualities , 2002 .

[5]  A. Hargreaves,et al.  Joe's Dilemma@@@Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers' Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age , 1995 .

[6]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[7]  James Miller.  Legitimation Crisis , 1975, Telos.

[8]  John Smyth,et al.  What's Wrong with Outcomes? Spotter planes, action plans, and steerage of the educational workplace , 1998 .

[9]  Neil Postman,et al.  The End of Education , 1996 .

[10]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  The emotional practice of teaching , 1998 .

[11]  A. Hargreaves.  Curriculum and assessment reform , 1991 .

[12]  Geoff Southworth,et al.  Staff Relationships in the Primary School: A Study of Organizational Cultures , 1989 .

[13]  M. Fullan,et al.  What's Worth Fighting For Out There? , 1998 .

[14]  Laurie Brady.  Outcome‐based education: a critique , 1996 .

[15]  A. Hargreaves.  The emotional politics of teaching and teacher development: with implications for educational leadership , 1998 .

[16]  H. Moore.  Telling What Is Real: Competing Views in Assessing ESL Development. , 1996 .

[17]  Jean A. King,et al.  Can We Achieve Outcome-Based Education?. , 1991 .

[18]  A. Hargreaves,et al.  Schooling for Change: Reinventing Education for Early Adolescents , 1996 .

[19]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[20]  The Role of Teachers in National Assessment in England. , 1998 .

[21]  Barbara Benham Tye.  Multiple Realities: A Study of 13 American High Schools , 1985 .

[22]  B. Zlatos.  Outcomes-Based Outrage. , 1993 .

[23]  M. Wallace.  Flexible Planning: A Key to the Management of Multiple Innovations , 1991 .

[24]  Categories, standards and instrumentalism: theorising the changing discourse of assessment policy in English primary education , 1998 .

[25]  J. Rudduck.  Innovation and change : developing involvement and understanding , 1991 .

[26]  N. Postman.  The end of education : redefining the value of school , 1996 .

[27]  Barbara Austin,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning , 1994 .