7 years experience of photopatch testing with sunscreen allergens in Sweden.

: Since 1990 7 sunscreen allergens have been included in the standard photopatch protocol at 2 Swedish dermatology clinics. 355 consecutive patients with suspected photosensitivity were tested, and in 28 of these (7.9%), a total of 42 allergic reactions were found. 80% of the reactions were of photocontact origin. The most common allergen was benzophenone-3 (Eusolex 4360), with 15 photocontact and 1 contact allergic reactions, followed by isopropyl dibenzoylmethane (Eusolex 8020) (8 photocontact, 4 contact) and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (Parsol 1789), with 6 photocontact reactions. There were 2 cases of photocontact allergy to phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid (Eusolex 232), which has not been reported previously. 1 case of contact urticaria from benzophenone-3 was accidentally found. In addition, 21 + reactions of doubtful relevance were noted in 14 patients: 16 on irradiated and 5 on non-irradiated test sites. Among these, irritant and phototoxic reactions may be included. These results indicate that the inclusion of UV filters in the standard photopatch protocol is important. Immediate-type testing for urticaria could also be of value.

[1]  C. Jansén,et al.  Photopatch test reactivity: effect of photoallergen concentration and UVA dosaging , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  N. Soter,et al.  Results of evaluation of 203 patients for photosensitivity in a 7.3-year period. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  B. Berne,et al.  Side effects of cosmetics and toiletries in relation to use: a retrospective study in a Swedish population , 1994 .

[4]  F. Urbach.  Risk of contact dermatitis from UV‐A sunscreens , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  J. Ferguson,et al.  Contact allergy to sunscreen chemicals in photosensitivity dermatitis/actinic reticuloid syndrome (PD/AR) and polymorphic light eruption (PLE) , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  R. Marks,et al.  The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population‐based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia , 1993, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  T. Menné,et al.  [Contact sensitivity to cosmetics in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark]. , 1993, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[8]  T. Fischer,et al.  Evaluation of customers' complaints about sunscreen cosmetics sold by the Swedish pharmaceutical company , 1991, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  A. Groot,et al.  The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[10]  S. Schauder,et al.  [Photoallergic and allergic contact eczema caused by dibenzoylmethane compounds and other sunscreening agents]. , 1988, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[11]  J. English,et al.  Sensitivity to sunscreens , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  P. Thune,et al.  The Scandinavian standard photopatch test procedure * , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  J. Jorizzo,et al.  Cutaneous plasmacytomas. A review and presentation of an unusual case. , 1979, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.