A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of Library 2.0 functionalities

[1]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A linguistic multicriteria decision‐making model applied to hotel service quality evaluation from web data sources , 2012, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users’ perceptions , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Vicent Giménez-Chornet,et al.  Impact of Web 2.0 on national libraries , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[4]  George Ghinea,et al.  Web 2.0 and folksonomies in a library context , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  M. Tripathi,et al.  Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape , 2010 .

[6]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A Model Based on Fuzzy Linguistic Information to Evaluate the Quality of Digital Libraries , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[7]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects , 2009, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[8]  Isto Huvila,et al.  What is Library 2.0? , 2009, J. Documentation.

[9]  David Lee King,et al.  Emerging Trends, 2.0, and Libraries , 2009 .

[10]  Nguyen Cuong Linh,et al.  A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.

[11]  Alison McIntyre,et al.  Biblioblogging: blogs for library communication , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[12]  Dimitris Gavrilis,et al.  Enhancing Library Services with Web 2.0 Functionalities , 2008, ECDL.

[13]  Angela Jowitt,et al.  Perceptions and usage of library instructional podcasts by staff and students at New Zealand's Universal College of Learning (UCOL) , 2008 .

[14]  Kate Maragliano.  Library 2.0: A Guide to Participatory Library Service , 2008 .

[15]  Louise L. Rutherford.  Implementing social software in public libraries: An exploration of the issues confronting public library adopters of social software , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.

[16]  Hong Xie,et al.  Users' evaluation of digital libraries (DLs): Their uses, their criteria, and their assessment , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology to Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[18]  Nicole Mitchell.  Library 2.0: A guide to participatory library service , 2008 .

[19]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of Web sites that store XML documents , 2007, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[20]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[21]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Taking the information to the public through Library 2.0 , 2007, Libr. Hi Tech.

[22]  George Ghinea,et al.  Digital libraries: what do users want? , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[23]  Jack M. Maness.  Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries , 2006, Webology.

[24]  Jeremy Frumkin,et al.  The Wiki and the digital library , 2005, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[25]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Evaluating the informative quality of documents in SGML format from judgements by means of fuzzy linguistic techniques based on computing with words , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  Score Norms for Improving Library Service Quality: A LibQUAL+ Study , 2002 .

[27]  Mireia Ribera Turró.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 , 2001 .

[28]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  The LibQUAL+gap measurement model: the bad, the ugly, and the good of gap measurement , 2000 .

[29]  Benjamin Keevil,et al.  Measuring the usability index of your Web site , 1998, SIGDOC '98.

[30]  Dimitar Filev,et al.  On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[31]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[32]  Vincenzo Loia,et al.  A new model for linguistic modifiers , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[33]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Soft computing and fuzzy logic , 1994, IEEE Software.

[35]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria , 1994 .

[36]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[37]  Matteo Gaeta,et al.  RSS-based e-learning recommendations exploiting fuzzy FCA for Knowledge Modeling , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[38]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Approaches to Multi-Stage Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[39]  N. Aharony,et al.  Web 2.0 use by librarians , 2009 .

[40]  Sanjay Kataria,et al.  Applications of Web 2 . 0 in the Enhancement of Services and Resource in Academic Libraries : An Experiment @ JIIT University Noida , India , 2009 .

[41]  Tom Storey,et al.  Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World. A Report to the OCLC Membership. , 2007 .

[42]  Deborah Lee,et al.  marketing 101: iPod, You-pod, We-pod: Podcasting and Marketing Library Services , 2006 .

[43]  Niels Ole Pors,et al.  Libraries Act on Their LIBQUAL+ Findings: From Data to Action , 2006 .

[44]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[45]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A note on weighted queries in information retrieval systems , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[46]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[47]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[48]  D. L. Beggs,et al.  Measurement and evaluation in the schools , 1974 .

[49]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .