The effects of operating a touch screen smartphone and other common activities performed while bicycling on cycling behaviour

Although it has been shown that making phone calls or sending text messages while riding a bicycle can have a negative impact on bicyclist’s behaviour, in countries such as the Netherlands the operation of a mobile phone while cycling on a bicycle is not illegal and is actually quite common. In recent years conventional mobile phones with a physical keypad are increasingly being replaced by smartphones with a touch screen. The operation of a touch screen phone ironically cannot be done purely ‘by touch’ due to the lack of tactile feedback, and instead requires fixations on a relatively small screen. The question therefore can be asked whether the operation of touch screen telephones deteriorates cycling behaviour more than operation of a conventional mobile phone. Twenty-four participants completed a track on their own bicycle while sending a text message from a conventional and a touch screen mobile phone. In addition the effects of other common activities that can accompany bicycling were studied, including texting at the same time as listening to music, talking on a mobile phone or cycling next to someone and speaking with this companion, and playing a game on a touch screen phone while bicycling. The impacts of all the above conditions on cycling performance and visual detection performance were compared with control conditions in which participants cycled with either one or two hands on the handlebars and were not required to perform any secondary tasks. Bicycle speed was reduced in all telephone conditions and in the condition when cycling next to someone. Lateral position variation increased in all telephone conditions. Use of the touch screen led to a more central position in the cycle lane and resulted in worse visual detection performance compared with the operation of a conventional mobile phone. The main effect of listening to music was that an auditory signal to stop cycling was missed by 83% of the participants. In conclusion, while all investigated types of phone deteriorated cycling performance, the use of a touch phone has a larger negative effect on cycling performance than a conventional mobile phone. With touch screen smartphones taking the place of conventional mobile phones and being used for other purposes than verbal communication, these effects on cycling performance pose a threat to traffic safety.

[1]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Natassia Goode,et al.  The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation , 2012, Ergonomics.

[3]  Masao Ichikawa,et al.  Japanese High School Students' Usage of Mobile Phones While Cycling , 2008, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.

[5]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Effects of listening to music, and of using a handheld and handsfree telephone on cycling behaviour , 2011 .

[6]  Gary E. Burnett,et al.  Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems , 2011, Ergonomics.

[8]  E. Williams Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[9]  F.R.H. Zijlstra,et al.  Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools , 1993 .

[10]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  The effects of motion on in-vehicle touch screen system operation: A battle management system case study , 2011 .

[11]  Ian Walker,et al.  Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  William P. Berg,et al.  The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking , 2009 .

[13]  Peter Bengtsson,et al.  A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Kathryn Terzano,et al.  Bicycling safety and distracted behavior in The Hague, the Netherlands. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  C Goldenbeld,et al.  The use and risk of portable electronic devices while cycling among different age groups. , 2012, Journal of safety research.

[16]  C Collet,et al.  Phoning while driving II: a review of driving conditions influence , 2010, Ergonomics.

[17]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Mobile phone use while cycling: Incidence and effects on behaviour and safety , 2010, Ergonomics.

[18]  Suzanne P McEvoy,et al.  The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Rik de Groot,et al.  Design manual for bicycle traffic , 2007 .

[20]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving , 2005 .

[21]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The relationship between distraction and driving performance: towards a test regime for in-vehicle information systems , 2005 .