Appropriate Home Technology: Depending on Dependable Technology Systems

Dwelling with computers, they become part of the informing environment, like weather, like street sounds. A house that is true to its house nature must have a certain quiet, even stolidness. Through a thousand subtle cues, computers will help turn our houses into homes. Weiser (1996) This paper is interested in explicating some of the multiple concerns involved in designing appropriate technology in domestic, or home, settings. As society becomes increasingly reliant on computer-based systems, and as domestic settings become increasingly technologised, the systems themselves have become increasingly complex and the need for dependable systems correspondingly important. Achieving sufficient dependability in these systems, and demonstrating this achievement in a rigorous and convincing manner, appears crucial in moving towards an inclusive Information Society. The paper reflects our interest in making some initial steps towards developing improved means of specifying, designing, assessing, deploying and maintaining complex socio-technical systems in domestic contexts where high dependability is crucial. As computer-based systems and artefacts penetrate more and more into people’s everyday lives and homes, the ‘design problem’ is not so much concerned with the creation of new technical artefacts as it is with their effective and dependable configuration and integration. It is evident that satisfactory resolution of such concerns demands major, interdisciplinary breakthroughs in understanding the development of complex socio-technical systems in domestic environments since inadequate understanding of the context of the lived reality of use and user needs is often a significant cause of lack of dependability. The paper also explores the ongoing DIRC project which is currently investigating these areas within its Project Activity ‘Dependable Ubiquitous Computing In The Home’. While this paper does not attempt to solve all of the presented issues it aims to illuminate and highlight some fields of investigation that might form the basis for future and ongoing research and development agendas for appropriate technological interventions in domestic settings

[1]  A. van Berlo,et al.  Design Guidelines on Smart Homes , 2001 .

[2]  Jun Xu,et al.  Towards dependable home networking: an experience report , 2000, Proceeding International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. DSN 2000.

[3]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  New Information Technologies in the Home: A Study of Uses, Impacts, and Design Strategies , 1999 .

[4]  Debby Hindus,et al.  The Importance of Homes in Technology Research , 1999, CoBuild.

[5]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Patterns of Technology Usage in the Home : Domestic Legacy and Design , 2001 .

[6]  Brian Randell,et al.  Facing up to Faults , 2000 .

[7]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  The Dwelling as a Place for Work , 1998, CoBuild.

[8]  Debby Hindus,et al.  Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home , 2001, CHI 2001.

[9]  M. Fisk,et al.  The implications of smart home technologies , 2001 .

[10]  Nahid Shahmehri,et al.  Towards Secure E-Services: Risk Analysis of a Home Automation Service , 2001 .

[11]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Working relations of technology production and use , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[12]  Mark Rouncefield,et al.  Ethnography Some Practicalities of Ethnographic Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Nigel Davies,et al.  Position paper: the role of platforms and operating systems in supporting home networks , 2000, EW 9.

[14]  Brian Randell,et al.  Fundamental Concepts of Dependability , 2000 .

[15]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design , 1994, CSCW '94.

[16]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  The networked home: an analysis of current developments and future trends , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[17]  G. Dewsbury The Social and Psychological Aspects of Smart Home Technolgy within the Care Sector , 2001 .

[18]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Chapter 28 ' Keep Taking The Medication ' : Assistive Technologies For Medication Regimes in Care Settings , 2003 .

[19]  Martin Edge,et al.  The potential for 'Smart Home' systems in meeting the care needs of older people with disabilities , 2000 .

[20]  Yi-Min Wang,et al.  A toolkit for building dependable and extensible home networking applications , 2000 .

[21]  A. Venkatesh,et al.  The Home of the Future: an Ethnographic Study of New Information Technologies in the Home , 2001 .

[22]  Shankar Ponnekanti,et al.  Pervasive computing: what is it good for? , 1999, MobiDe '99.

[23]  G. Dewsbury,et al.  Designing the Home to Meet the Needs of Tomorrow.... Today: Deconstructing and Rebuilding the Home for Life , 2000 .

[24]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Tony Kinder A sociotechnical approach to the innovation of a network technology in the public sector – the introduction of smart homes in West Lothian , 2000 .

[26]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Sociologists can be surprisingly useful in interactive systems design , 1992 .

[27]  David Gann,et al.  A changing sense of place: are integrated IT systems reshaping the home? , 1998 .

[28]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[29]  Martin Edge,et al.  Designing Safe Smart Home Systems for Vulnerable People , 2001 .

[30]  Peter Williams,et al.  Analysis of the value of home automation systems , 2001 .