Incorporation of flexural hinge fatigue-life cycle criteria into the topological design of compliant small-scale devices

Abstract The design synthesis of compliant mechanisms yields optimized topologies that combine several stiff parts with highly elastic flexural hinges. The hinges are often represented in a finite element analysis by a single node (one-node hinge), which leaves the actual physical meaning of the hinge (to be fabricated) ambiguous. In order to circumvent this problem, in this work, one-noded hinges have the fatigue-life incorporated into them during the design synthesis by embedding analytical expressions accounting for stress concentration, surface finish, non-zero mean stresses and superposed multiple loading conditions into the formulation. Various flexural hinges with rectangular, circular and parabolic profile geometries are investigated. By incorporating the hinge geometry and fatigue behavior into the design process, unclear interpretation issues that would be encountered during any later manufacturing stage of a compliant mechanism design are removed. Examples are provided to illustrate the overall process.

[1]  David Zhang,et al.  Three flexure hinges for compliant mechanism designs based on dimensionless graph analysis , 2010 .

[2]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  Designing compliant mechanisms , 1995 .

[3]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Compliant Mechanisms: Design of Flexure Hinges , 2002 .

[4]  S. Suresh.  Fatigue of materials , 1991 .

[5]  John Rasmussen,et al.  An integrated approach for shape and topology optimization of shell structures , 2002 .

[6]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Parabolic and hyperbolic flexure hinges: flexibility, motion precision and stress characterization based on compliance closed-form equations , 2002 .

[7]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization , 1997 .

[8]  Jaap Schijve,et al.  Fatigue of structures and materials , 2001 .

[9]  T. E. Bruns,et al.  Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[10]  David Zhang,et al.  Closed-form compliance equations of filleted V-shaped flexure hinges for compliant mechanism design , 2010 .

[11]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Development of Commercially Viable Compliant Mechanisms Using the Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model: Case Studies of Parallel Mechanisms , 2001, Adaptive Structures and Material Systems.

[12]  Stuart T. Smith,et al.  Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms , 2000 .

[13]  John Goodman,et al.  Mechanics applied to engineering , 1904 .

[14]  Rolf Lammering,et al.  On mechanical properties of planar flexure hinges of compliant mechanisms , 2011 .

[15]  M. I.Z. Ridzwan,et al.  Methodology of Compliant Mechanisms and its Current Developments in Applications: A Review , 2007 .

[16]  Walter D. Pilkey.  Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors , 1997 .

[17]  J. Paros.  How to design flexure hinges , 1965 .

[18]  R. Michel,et al.  FACTOR OF SAFETY AND WORKING STRESSES OF MARINE PROPULSION SHAFTING , 2009 .

[19]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[20]  Thomas A. Poulsen.  A simple scheme to prevent checkerboard patterns and one-node connected hinges in topology optimization , 2002 .

[21]  Michael Vormwald,et al.  Ermüdungsfestigkeit Grundlagen für Ingenieure , 2007 .

[22]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  On an optimal property of compliant topologies , 2000 .