Retinal Flow Is Sufficient for Steering During Observer Rotation

How do people control locomotion while their eyes are simultaneously rotating? A previous study found that during simulated rotation, they can perceive a straight path of self-motion from the retinal flow pattern, despite conflicting extraretinal information, on the basis of dense motion parallax and reference objects. Here we report that the same information is sufficient for active control of joystick steering. Participants steered toward a target in displays that simulated a pursuit eye movement. Steering was highly inaccurate with a textured ground plane (motion parallax alone), but quite accurate when an array of posts was added (motion parallax plus reference objects). This result is consistent with the theory that instantaneous heading is determined from motion parallax, and the path of self-motion is determined by updating heading relative to environmental objects. Retinal flow is thus sufficient for both perceiving self-motion and controlling self-motion with a joystick; extraretinal and positional information can also contribute, but are not necessary.

[1]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[2]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[3]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[4]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  James A. Crowell,et al.  The perception of heading during eye movements , 1992, Nature.

[8]  A. V. D. Berg,et al.  Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading , 1994, Nature.

[10]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[11]  E Brenner,et al.  Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  J. Perrone,et al.  Human Heading Estimation During Visually Simulated Curvilinear Motion , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow , 1998, Current Biology.

[15]  M. Banks,et al.  Depth information and perceived self-motion during simulated gaze rotations , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Steering, Optic Flow, and the Respective Importance of Depth and Retinal Motion Distribution , 1999, Perception.

[17]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Where we Go With a Little Good Information , 1999 .

[18]  J E Cutting,et al.  Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D H Owen,et al.  The utility of motion parallax information for the perception and control of heading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Weighting to go with the flow? , 2000, Current Biology.

[21]  Li Li,et al.  Perception of heading during rotation: sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  M G Harris,et al.  Is Optic Flow Used to Guide Walking While Wearing a Displacing Prism? , 2001, Perception.

[23]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.