Precision of a Hand-Held 3D Surface Scanner in Dry and Wet Skeletal Surfaces: An Ex Vivo Study

Three-dimensional surface scans of skeletal structures have various clinical and research applications in medicine, anthropology, and other relevant fields. The aim of this study was to test the precision of a widely used hand-held surface scanner and the associated software’s 3D model generation-error in both dry and wet skeletal surfaces. Ten human dry skulls and ten mandibles (dry and wet conditions) were scanned twice with an industrial scanner (Artec Space Spider) by one operator. Following a best-fit superimposition of corresponding surface model pairs, the mean absolute distance (MAD) between them was calculated on ten anatomical regions on the skulls and six on the mandibles. The software’s 3D model generation process was repeated for the same scan of four dry skulls and four mandibles (wet and dry conditions), and the results were compared in a similar manner. The median scanner precision was 31 μm for the skulls and 25 μm for the mandibles in dry conditions, whereas in wet conditions it was slightly lower at 40 μm for the mandibles. The 3D model generation-error was negligible (range: 5–10 μm). The Artec Space Spider scanner exhibits very high precision in the scanning of dry and wet skeletal surfaces.

[1]  N. Gkantidis,et al.  Novel Anterior Cranial Base Area for Voxel-Based Superimposition of Craniofacial CBCTs , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  Zhouxiao Li,et al.  3D Anthropometric Facial Imaging - A comparison of different 3D scanners. , 2022, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[3]  N. Gkantidis,et al.  Reliability of cephalometric superimposition for the assessment of craniofacial changes: a systematic review. , 2022, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  F. Huettig,et al.  Accuracy of capturing oncology nasal, orbital, and auricular defects with extra- and intraoral optical scanners and smartphone: An in vitro study , 2021, Journal of Dentistry.

[5]  N. Gkantidis,et al.  Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  N. Gkantidis,et al.  Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial cone-beam computed tomographies for facial soft tissue assessment: Reproducibility and segmentation effects. , 2021, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  Yilmaz Yildirim,et al.  Assessment of the reliability of hand-held surface scanner in the evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2021, European Spine Journal.

[8]  C. Katsaros,et al.  Facial shape affects self-perceived facial attractiveness. , 2021, PloS one.

[9]  Zhi-heng Liu,et al.  Low Radiation X-rays: Benefiting People Globally by Reducing Cancer Risks , 2021, International journal of medical sciences.

[10]  Mohd Javaid,et al.  Industrial Perspectives of 3D scanning: Features, Roles and it's Analytical Applications , 2021, Sensors International.

[11]  Nikolaos Gkantidis,et al.  Assessment of methods used for 3-dimensional superimposition of craniofacial skeletal structures: a systematic review , 2020, PeerJ.

[12]  D. Halazonetis,et al.  The effect of threshold level on bone segmentation of cranial base structures from CT and CBCT images , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Nikolaos Gkantidis,et al.  Trueness and precision of intraoral scanners in the maxillary dental arch: an in vivo analysis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[14]  N. Gkantidis,et al.  Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: reliability, reproducibility, and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes. , 2020, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[15]  Wuchen Zhang,et al.  Application of Structured‐Light 3‐D Scanning to the Documentation of Plastic Fingerprint Impressions: A Quality Comparison with Traditional Photography , 2019, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  Kerri L. Colman,et al.  Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans. , 2019, Forensic science international.

[17]  Nikolaos Gkantidis,et al.  The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[18]  G. Santaella,et al.  Evaluation of soft tissues simulant materials in cone beam computed tomography. , 2019, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  Olivier Delémont,et al.  CT-scan vs. 3D surface scanning of a skull: first considerations regarding reproducibility issues , 2017, Forensic sciences research.

[20]  Zheng Liu,et al.  Three-dimensional Imaging and Scanning: Current and Future Applications for Pathology , 2017, Journal of pathology informatics.

[21]  Maren Lindstaedt,et al.  COMPARATIVE GEOMETRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF HAND-HELD SCANNING SYSTEMS , 2016 .

[22]  Michael J Thali,et al.  Accident or homicide--virtual crime scene reconstruction using 3D methods. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[23]  Janalt Damstra,et al.  The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models , 2013, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[24]  Nikolaos A. Papadopulos,et al.  Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy Assessment of Different 3-D Surface Imaging Systems for Biomedical Purposes , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[25]  M. Friess,et al.  Scratching the Surface? The use of surface scanning in physical and paleoanthropology. , 2012, Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS.

[26]  H. Park,et al.  Use of hand-held laser scanning in the assessment of craniometry. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[27]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  Richard Milner,et al.  The Encyclopedia of Evolution: Humanity's Search for Its Origins , 1990 .

[29]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. , 1976, American journal of orthodontics.