Theories: For Academics and Practitioners

Abstract Academics consider theories to be the bedrock of scientific research, while some business practitioners find them esoteric and difficult to understand. Previous discussions on this issue have often framed theories and research in terms of either rigor or relevance—with little middle ground for academics and practitioners to meet. This article maintains theories are useful to academics and practitioners, and that it is essential for both parties to take advantage of the characteristics and usefulness of theories. This article suggests specific ways academic researchers and business practitioners can effectively use a full range of theories.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  R. Daft,et al.  Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics , 2001 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[4]  Lewis M. Branscomb,et al.  Ease of Use: A System Design Challenge , 1984, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  L. Porter,et al.  Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? , 1988 .

[6]  G A Cioffi,et al.  Theoretically speaking , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[7]  J. Kotter.  Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Markus,et al.  Editor's Comments: Looking for a Few Good Concepts...and Theories...for the Information Systems Field , 2007 .

[9]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Steps Towards More Effective Implementation of MS and MIS , 1978 .

[10]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems , 1998 .

[11]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .

[12]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[13]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[14]  Steven W. Floyd,et al.  Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance , 2004 .

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[16]  R. Campbell,et al.  A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. , 1968 .

[17]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[18]  D. Larcker,et al.  PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION: A PSYCHOMETRIC EXAMINATION* , 1980 .

[19]  J. Hauser,et al.  Profit Maximizing Perceptual Positions: An Integrated Theory for the Selection of Product Features and Price , 1981 .

[20]  A. H. Van de.  Nothing Is Quite So Practical as a Good Theory. , 1989 .

[21]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  Cameron M. Ford,et al.  Management as Science versus Management as Practice in Postgraduate Business Education , 1996 .

[24]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .