“No Boundaries”? Girls’ Interactive, Online Learning About Femininities

This article explores girls’ learning about issues of femininity that takes place in the presence of others online, connected through chat rooms, instant messaging, and role-playing games. Informed by critical and poststructuralist feminist theorizing of gendered subjectivity, agency, and power, the article draws from qualitative interviews with 16 girls in Vancouver, Canada. Girls reported that online activities allowed them to rehearse different ways of being before trying them out offline, where they might have been reined in for going against perceived expectations for their gender. The article shows that girls enjoyed playing with gender and being gender rebellious. They practiced taking more initiative in heterosexual relationships than is currently authorized in prevailing rules of romance. Without necessarily challenging the underlying gendered power inequalities, some battled back in cyberspace against sexual harassment. In the conclusion, the authors reflect on the implications for girls’ individual and collective empowerment and for transformative pedagogy.

[1]  C. Paechter.  Learning masculinities and femininities: power/knowledge and legitimate peripheral participation , 2003 .

[2]  D. Kelly,et al.  Sk8er girls: Skateboarders, girlhood and feminism in motion , 2004 .

[3]  W. Hollway,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method , 2000 .

[4]  Alice Christie.  Using E-mail Within a Classroom Based on Feminist Pedagogy , 1997 .

[5]  Neil Duncan.  It's important to be nice, but it's nicer to be important: girls, popularity and sexual competition , 2004 .

[6]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  THE SOCIAL GEOGRAPHY OF GENDER-SWITCHING IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS ON THE INTERNET , 1999 .

[7]  D. Merten.  Going It , 1877, Hall's journal of health.

[8]  Anita Harris.  All About the Girl: Culture, Power, and Identity , 2004 .

[9]  E. Ellsworth,et al.  Becoming feminine : the politics of popular culture , 1988 .

[10]  J. Jenson,et al.  Girl talk: gender, equity, and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture , 2003 .

[11]  J. Davies.  Negotiating femininities online , 2004 .

[12]  Sheila T. Cavanagh.  Dangeours Territories: Struggles for Difference and Equality in Education , 1998 .

[13]  Paul Hodkinson,et al.  Goth: Identity, Style and Subculture , 2002 .

[14]  D. Holland.  Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds , 1998 .

[15]  Chris Weedon.  Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory , 1987 .

[16]  Dawn H. Currie,et al.  ‘The geeks shall inherit the earth’: Girls’ Agency, Subjectivity and Empowerment , 2006 .

[17]  Alison L Jones.  Becoming a "Girl": Post-Structuralist Suggestions for Educational Research. , 1993 .

[18]  Nancy Fraser,et al.  Sex, Lies, and the Public Sphere: Some Reflections on the Confirmation of Clarence Thomas , 1992, Critical Inquiry.

[19]  Graciela Hierro,et al.  Gender and Power , 1994, Hypatia.

[20]  R. Connell,et al.  Encounters with structure , 2004 .

[21]  Carrie Paechter,et al.  Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice , 2003 .

[22]  Diane J. Schiano.  Lessons from LambdaMOO: A Social, Text-Based Virtual Environment , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  Ken Gelder,et al.  The subcultures reader , 1999 .

[24]  Rosamund Sutherland,et al.  What's the Point of Using Computers? , 2001, New Media Soc..

[25]  S. Moore.  Pregnant with Meaning: Teen Mothers and the Politics of Inclusive Schooling , 2003 .

[26]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[27]  Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre,et al.  Working the Ruins: Feminist Poststructural Theory and Methods in Education , 1999 .

[28]  N. Bingham,et al.  Institutionalising Technologies: Masculinities, Femininities, and the Heterosexual Economy of the IT Classroom , 2000 .

[29]  David Halle,et al.  Product Review: Hanging out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online , 2004 .

[30]  D. Smith.  FEMININITY AS DISCOURSE , 2002 .

[31]  B. Thorne,et al.  Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School , 1993 .

[32]  J. Dillabough.  Class, culture and the ‘predicaments of masculine domination’: encountering Pierre Bourdieu , 2004 .

[33]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[34]  D. Kelly,et al.  Skater girlhood and emphasized femininity: ‘you can't land an ollie properly in heels’ , 2005 .

[35]  Beth E. Kolko,et al.  Representing Bodies in Virtual Space: The Rhetoric of Avatar Design , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[36]  J. Butler.  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[37]  B. Francis.  Power Plays: Children's constructions of gender and power in role plays , 1997 .

[38]  Yasmin Jiwani,et al.  Girlhood: Redefining the Limits , 2006 .

[39]  L. Nelson,et al.  Bodies (and Spaces) do Matter: The limits of performativity , 1999 .

[40]  B. Davies.  Shards of Glass: Children Reading and Writing Beyond Gendered Identities , 1995 .

[41]  Simeon J. Yates.  Gender, identity and CMC , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[42]  S. Holloway,et al.  Cyberkids? Exploring Children’s Identities and Social Networks in On-line and Off-line Worlds , 2002 .

[43]  D. Kellner,et al.  Contemporary Youth and the Postmodern Adventure , 2003 .

[44]  Michelle Rodino,et al.  Breaking out of Binaries: Reconceptualizing Gender and its Relationship to Languagein Computer-Mediated Communication , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..