论文信息 - A note on the independence of premiss rule

A note on the independence of premiss rule

In this paper, we prove that certain theories of (many-sorted) intuitionistic predicate logic is closed under the independence of premiss rule (IPR). As corollaries, we show that HA and HA ! extended by some non-classical axioms and non-constructive axioms are closed under IPR.

Hajime Ishihara | Takako Nemoto | H. Ishihara | Takako Nemoto

[1] Hajime Ishihara. Some Conservative Extension Results on Classical and Intuitionistic Sequent Calculi , 2012 .

[2] Ulrich Kohlenbach,et al. Applied Proof Theory - Proof Interpretations and their Use in Mathematics , 2008, Springer Monographs in Mathematics.

[3] A. Troelstra,et al. Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction , 1988 .

[4] C. McCarty. CONSTRUCTIVISM IN MATHEMATICS , 2009 .

[5] Hajime Ishihara,et al. Some principles weaker than Markov’s principle , 2015, Arch. Math. Log..

[6] Daniel Leivant,et al. Syntactic translations and provably recursive functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[7] A. Troelstra. Metamathematical investigation of intuitionistic arithmetic and analysis , 1973 .

[8] H. Ishihara. A Note on theGödel-Gentzen Translation , 2000 .

[9] Hajime Ishihara. A Note on the Gödel-Gentzen Translation , 2000, Math. Log. Q..