Recall costs balanced against spoilage control in Dutch custard.

The relation between the moment at which a recall of Dutch custard is initiated and the direct costs of this recall was investigated. A simulation model of the custard supply chain was developed to compare scenarios with and without a quarantine of 48 h at the storage of the production plant. The model consists of 3 parts: 1) the distribution of a 24,000-L batch of custard over the supply chain over time is simulated; 2) the time to detect spoilage bacteria with a recontamination test procedure is simulated; and 3) the direct recall costs of custard over the different parts of the supply chain are calculated. Direct recall costs increase from about 25,000 euros/batch to 36,171 euros/batch from 57 to 135 h in the situation without quarantine and from 25,000 euros/batch to 36,648 euros/batch from 123 h to 163 h for the situation with quarantine. Then costs decrease because more and more custard is at the consumer level and only 0.13% of the consumers will ask for a refund. With low true contamination probabilities quarantine is not profitable, but at later detection moments with high probabilities it is. We conclude that a simulation model is a helpful tool to evaluate the efficiency of risk management strategies like end product testing and a quarantine situation.

[1]  Neal H. Hooker,et al.  Understanding the characteristics of US meat and poultry recalls: 1994-2002 , 2004 .

[2]  K. Boor,et al.  Tracking heat-resistant, cold-thriving fluid milk spoilage bacteria from farm to packaged product. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Jerry R. Skees,et al.  The potential for recall insurance to improve food safety , 2001 .

[4]  R. Huirne,et al.  Eliciting processing industry damage from feed crises. , 2009 .

[5]  D. Vose Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide , 2000 .

[6]  John D. Brooks,et al.  Biofilms in the food industry: problems and potential solutions , 2008 .

[7]  R. Huirne,et al.  Distribution of direct recall costs along the milk chain , 2009 .

[8]  A. Guinet,et al.  Batch dispersion model to optimise traceability in food industry , 2005 .

[9]  Ratapol P. Teratanavat,et al.  Recall event timing: Measures of managerial performance in U.S. meat and poultry plants , 2005 .

[10]  Melvin N Kramer,et al.  The science of recalls. , 2005, Meat science.

[11]  S. Ahrné,et al.  Contamination of milk with Gram-negative spoilage bacteria during filling of retail containers , 2000 .

[12]  R. Waalewijn,et al.  Adherence, growth and release of bacteria in a tube heat exchanger for milk , 1995 .

[13]  D. Veal,et al.  Specific detection of Pseudomonas spp. in milk by fluorescence in situ hybridization using ribosomal RNA directed probes. , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[14]  G. Molin,et al.  Critical Contamination Sites in the Production Line of Pasteurised Milk, with Reference to the Psychrotrophic Spoilage Flora , 1998 .

[15]  R. Huirne,et al.  TRACEABILITY AND CERTIFICATION IN MEAT SUPPLY CHAINS , 2003 .

[16]  C. A. van Dorp,et al.  Reference-data modelling for tracking and tracing , 2004 .