Characterization of fractured reservoirs using tracer and flow‐rate data

[1] This article introduces a robust method for characterizing fractured reservoirs using tracer and flow-rate data. The flow-rate data are used to infer the interwell connectivity matrix, which describes how injected fluids are divided between producers in the reservoir. The tracer data are used to find a function called the tracer kernel for each injector-producer connection. The tracer kernel describes the volume and dispersive properties of the interwell flow path. A combination of parametric and nonparametric regression methods was developed to estimate the tracer kernels in situations where data are collected at variable flow rate or variable-injected concentration conditions. This characterization method was developed to describe enhanced geothermal systems, although it works well in general for characterizing incompressible flow in fractured reservoirs (e.g., geothermal, carbon sequestration, radioactive waste and waterfloods of oil fields) where transverse dispersivity can be considered negligible and production takes place at constant bottomhole pressure conditions. The inferred metrics can be used to sketch informative field maps and predict tracer breakthrough curves at variable flow-rate conditions.

[1]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  A Bayesian geostatistical transfer function approach to tracer test analysis , 2006 .

[2]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Bayesian inverse problem and optimization with iterative spatial resampling , 2010 .

[3]  B. Berkowitz Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review , 2002 .

[4]  A. Zuber,et al.  On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions , 1978 .

[5]  P. Renard,et al.  Dealing with spatial heterogeneity , 2005 .

[6]  T. Edgar,et al.  Optimization Of Oil Production Based On A Capacitance Model Of Production And Injection Rates , 2007 .

[7]  Chrystel Dezayes,et al.  Fracture Characterization and Stochastic Modeling of the Granitic Basement in the HDR Soultz Project (France) , 2010 .

[8]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity , 2005 .

[9]  Jonathan Richard Shewchuk,et al.  Triangle: Engineering a 2D Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator , 1996, WACG.

[10]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks , 2005 .

[11]  L. Lake,et al.  Inferring Interwell Connectivity Only From Well-Rate Fluctuations in Waterfloods , 2003 .

[12]  C. Tsang,et al.  Flow channeling in heterogeneous fractured rocks , 1998 .

[13]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Identifying discrete geologic structures that produce anomalous hydraulic response: An inverse modeling approach , 2008 .

[14]  Kun-Han Lee,et al.  Investigating statistical modeling approaches for reservoir characterization in waterfloods from rates fluctuations , 2010 .

[15]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Connectivity of random fault networks following a power law fault length distribution , 1997 .

[16]  C. S. Kabir,et al.  The Use of Capacitance-Resistive Models for Rapid Estimation of Waterflood Performance , 2007 .

[17]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Inferring Interwell Connectivity From Well-Rate Fluctuations in Waterfloods , 2002 .

[18]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Three‐dimensional steady state flow to a well in a randomly heterogeneous bounded aquifer , 2003 .

[19]  D. Bullivant,et al.  Matching a field tracer test with some simple models , 1989 .

[20]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Analysis of fracture network connectivity using percolation theory , 1995 .

[21]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  Generation of coarse‐scale continuum flow models from detailed fracture characterizations , 2006 .

[22]  Anh Viet Dinh Interwell connectivity tests in waterflood systems , 2009 .

[23]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  When good statistical models of aquifer heterogeneity go bad: A comparison of flow, dispersion, and mass transfer in connected and multivariate Gaussian hydraulic conductivity fields , 2003 .

[24]  M. Manning,et al.  Radioactive tracers in geothermal underground water flow studies , 1983 .

[25]  T. Manzocchi The connectivity of two‐dimensional networks of spatially correlated fractures , 2002 .

[26]  Philippe Davy,et al.  Statistical characteristics of flow as indicators of channeling in heterogeneous porous and fractured media , 2010 .

[27]  Tetsuya Yahara,et al.  Sustainability of the Hatchobaru geothermal field, Japan , 2010 .

[28]  Xavier Sanchez-Vila,et al.  Point-to-point connectivity, an abstract concept or a key issue for risk assessment studies? , 2008 .

[29]  Pablo Hugo Gentil,et al.  A Capacitance Model To Infer Interwell Connectivity From Production and Injection Rate Fluctuations , 2005 .

[30]  Djebbar Tiab,et al.  Interpretation of Interwell Connectivity Tests in a Waterflood System , 2008 .

[31]  Piotr Maloszewski,et al.  On the theory of tracer experiments in fissured rocks with a porous matrix , 1985 .

[32]  Olivier Bour,et al.  Connectivity properties of two‐dimensional fracture networks with stochastic fractal correlation , 2003 .

[33]  Bernard Bourbiaux,et al.  Fractured Reservoir Simulation: a Challenging and Rewarding Issue , 2010 .

[34]  R. Grayson,et al.  Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns , 2001 .