HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.

BACKGROUND In October 1999, we began to measure the effect of a single round of screening by testing for human papillomavirus (HPV), cytologic testing, or visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) on the incidence of cervical cancer and the associated rates of death in the Osmanabad district in India. METHODS In this cluster-randomized trial, 52 clusters of villages, with a total of 131,746 healthy women between the ages of 30 and 59 years, were randomly assigned to four groups of 13 clusters each. The groups were randomly assigned to undergo screening by HPV testing (34,126 women), cytologic testing (32,058), or VIA (34,074) or to receive standard care (31,488, control group). Women who had positive results on screening underwent colposcopy and directed biopsies, and those with cervical precancerous lesions or cancer received appropriate treatment. RESULTS In the HPV-testing group, cervical cancer was diagnosed in 127 subjects (of whom 39 had stage II or higher), as compared with 118 subjects (of whom 82 had advanced disease) in the control group (hazard ratio for the detection of advanced cancer in the HPV-testing group, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.69). There were 34 deaths from cancer in the HPV-testing group, as compared with 64 in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.83). No significant reductions in the numbers of advanced cancers or deaths were observed in the cytologic-testing group or in the VIA group, as compared with the control group. Mild adverse events were reported in 0.1% of screened women. CONCLUSIONS In a low-resource setting, a single round of HPV testing was associated with a significant reduction in the numbers of advanced cervical cancers and deaths from cervical cancer.

[1]  R. Rajkumar,et al.  Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[2]  R. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  A Practical Manual on Visual Screening for Cervical Neoplasia , 2003 .

[3]  O. M. Jensen,et al.  Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods , 1991 .

[4]  Valérie Buthion,et al.  ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas – Study protocol , 1999, BMC Cancer.

[5]  Peter Devilee,et al.  Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs , 2003 .

[6]  D. Solomon,et al.  From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: The rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  R. Hayes,et al.  Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  D. Parkin,et al.  A cluster randomized controlled trial of visual, cytology and human papillomavirus screening for cancer of the cervix in rural India , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[9]  E. Berg,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas C Wright,et al.  Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[11]  John W. Sellows,et al.  Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia : a beginners' manual . Sellors, R. Sankaranarayanan , 2003 .

[12]  Rajaraman Swaminathan,et al.  Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[13]  Feng Chen,et al.  A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.