Accuracy of Bone Resection in MAKO Total Knee Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Abstract Accurate component positioning and planning is vital to prevent malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as malalignment is associated with an increased rate of polyethylene wear and revision arthroplasty. The MAKO total knee robotic arm-assisted surgery (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) uses a preoperative computed tomography scan of the patient's knee and three-dimensional planning to size and orientate implants prior to bone resection. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the MAKO Total Knee system in achieving the preoperative plan for bone resection and final limb coronal alignment. A series of 45 consecutive cases was performed using the MAKO Total Knee system and Triathlon Total Knee implant (Stryker) between April 2018 and May 2019. The difference between what was planned and what was achieved for bone resection and coronal limb alignment was calculated. A total of 37 patients had their data captured using the MAKO system software. Mean difference from the plan for distal femoral cuts was 0.38mm (0.32) deep/proud, anterior femoral cuts 0.44mm (0.27) deep/proud and tibial cuts 0.37mm (0.30) deep/proud. In total, 99 out of 105 (94.29%) of bone resections were within 1mm of the plan. Mean absolute difference in final limb coronal alignment was 0.78° (0.78), with 78.13% being ≤1.00° of the plan, and 100% being ≤3.00° of the plan. The accuracy in achieving preoperatively planned bone resection and final limb coronal alignment using the MAKO Total Knee system is high. Future research is planned to look at whether this is associated with decreased rates of polyethylene wear and revision arthroplasty.

[1]  J. Vun,et al.  Increased precision of coronal plane outcomes in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[2]  Yuning Wang,et al.  Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2018, Der Orthopäde.

[3]  S. Konan,et al.  Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty , 2018, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  P. Brooks SEVEN LITTLE CUTS TO THE PERFECT TKA , 2018 .

[5]  D. Jacofsky,et al.  Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared with Manual Techniques , 2018, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[6]  P. Rowe,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  D. Griffin,et al.  Does malalignment affect revision rate in total knee replacements: a systematic review of the literature , 2015, SpringerPlus.

[8]  M. Ritter,et al.  The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  P. Brooks Seven cuts to the perfect total knee. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[10]  William R Walsh,et al.  The accuracy of bone resections made during computer navigated total knee replacement. Do we resect what the computer plans we resect? , 2008, The Knee.

[11]  Markus Tingart,et al.  Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[12]  N. Tubbs Surgery of the knee. , 1985, The Practitioner.

[13]  R. Bryan,et al.  Total knee replacement. , 1981, Instructional course lectures.