Interactive fitting of multiple algorithms implemented in the same digital hearing aid
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G Keidser. The Relationship Between Listening Conditions and Alternative Amplification Schemes for Multiple Memory Hearing Aids , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[2] F K Kuk,et al. Relative satisfaction for frequency responses selected with a simplex procedure in different listening conditions. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[3] F K Kuk,et al. Effect of hearing aid experience on preferred insertion gain selection. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[4] S. C. Purdy,et al. FIABILITE, SENSIBILITE ET VALIDITE DU JUGEMENT DE L'INTELLIGIBILITE DE LA PAROLE OBTENUES PAR ESTIMATION DE LA GRANDEUR, ESTIMATION CATEGORIELLE ET COMPARAISON PAR PAIRES CHEZ DES SUJETS AGES , 1992 .
[5] D D Dirks,et al. Preferred frequency response for two- and three-channel amplification systems. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[6] T Houtgast,et al. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] H Levitt,et al. Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Methodological aspects of an adaptive multidirectional pattern search to optimize speech perception using three hearing-aid algorithms , 2004 .
[9] Comparison of preferred frequency gain settings obtained with category rating and modified simplex procedure. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[10] H Levitt,et al. An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] P. Moran. On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.
[12] H Levitt,et al. Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] F K Kuk,et al. The reliability of a modified simplex procedure in hearing aid frequency-response selection. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[14] D Byrne,et al. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] J. Punch,et al. Listener-assessed intelligibility of hearing aid-processed speech. , 1977, Journal of the American Auditory Society.
[16] D D Dirks,et al. Subjective Judgments of Speech Clarity Measured by Paired Comparisons and Category Rating , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[17] C V Pavlovic,et al. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[18] Etienne Parizet,et al. Paired comparison listening tests and circular error rates , 2002 .
[19] G Keidser,et al. Candidates for Multiple Frequency Response Characteristics , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[20] S ZERLIN,et al. A new approach to hearing-aid selection. , 1962, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[21] G A Studebaker,et al. Paired comparison judgments of relative intelligibility in noise. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.