Motion adaptation in area MT.

In many sensory systems, exposure to a prolonged stimulus causes adaptation, which tends to reduce neural responses to subsequent stimuli. Such effects are usually stimulus-specific, making adaptation a powerful probe into information processing. We used dynamic random dot kinematograms to test the magnitude and selectivity of adaptation effects in the middle temporal area (MT) and to compare them to effects on human motion discrimination. After 3 s of adaptation to a random dot pattern moving in the preferred direction, MT neuronal responses to subsequent test patterns were reduced by 26% on average compared with adaptation to a static pattern. This reduction in response magnitude was largely independent of what test stimulus was presented. However, adaptation in the opposite direction changed responses less often and very inconsistently. Therefore motion adaptation systematically and profoundly affects the neurons in MT representing the adapted direction, but much less those representing the opposite direction. In human psychophysical experiments, such adapting stimuli affected direction discrimination, biasing choices away from the adaptation direction. The magnitude of this perceptual shift was consistent with the magnitude of the changes seen in area MT, if one assumes that a motion comparison step occurs after MT.

[1]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[2]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[3]  H Barlow,et al.  Correspondence Noise and Signal Pooling in the Detection of Coherent Visual Motion , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  O. Braddick,et al.  Responses to Opposed Directions of Motion: Continuum or Independent Mechanisms? , 1996, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[7]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  T D Albright,et al.  Visual motion perception. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity to motion signals in extrastriate area MST of the macaque monkey , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Blake,et al.  Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Hidehiko Komatsu,et al.  A grid system and a microsyringe for single cell recording , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Multiple visual areas in the caudal superior temporal sulcus of the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  S. Petersen,et al.  Direction-specific adaptation in area MT of the owl monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Lance M. Optican,et al.  Unix-based multiple-process system, for real-time data acquisition and control , 1982 .

[21]  B. Richmond,et al.  Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method , 1980, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Morgan,et al.  Conditions for motion flow in dynamic visual noise , 1980, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Mather The Movement Aftereffect and a Distribution-Shift Model for Coding the Direction of Visual Movement , 1980, Perception.

[24]  R. Haber,et al.  Visual Perception , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[25]  K. M. L. Suxena,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Theory , 1976 .

[26]  S. Zeki Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .